Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Pressed by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Charlie Rose finally offers the other side of the deficit debate — featuring truth tellers Dean Baker and Jan Schakowsky.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting has in recent days highlighted the fact that public television’s Charlie Rose show has provided an absurdly one-sided take on the debate about how to address the federal deficit.

"(The) Rose show’s discussion of the White House deficit commission has been dominated by right-leaning guests who were supportive of the plan put forward by commission co-chairs Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson," argued FAIR in a pointed critique issued November 16.

That critique noted that — and an action alert associated with it — pointed out that economist Dean Baker and other experts had skewered the report of the commission co-chairs as "fundamentally flawed."

Tonight, Rose will feature Baker—who works with the the Center for Economic and Policy Research—on his program, along with Illinois Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, a member of the deficit commission who has developed a progressive alternative to the Simpson-Bowles proposal. Unlike the co-chairs, Schakowsky protects Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

FAIR’s claiming victory—graciously.

 "FAIR thanks those who wrote to the Charlie Rose Show and encouraged them to expand their guest list. And the Charlie Rose show should be commended for taking these criticisms seriously," the group announced this afternoon. "The fact that the program is broadening its discussion is a testament to the power of media activism."

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x