Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Charlie Rose’s FAIR Take on the Deficit Debate

Pressed by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Charlie Rose finally offers the other side of the deficit debate — featuring truth tellers Dean Baker and Jan Schakowsky.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting has in recent days highlighted the fact that public television’s Charlie Rose show has provided an absurdly one-sided take on the debate about how to address the federal deficit.

"(The) Rose show’s discussion of the White House deficit commission has been dominated by right-leaning guests who were supportive of the plan put forward by commission co-chairs Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson," argued FAIR in a pointed critique issued November 16.

That critique noted that — and an action alert associated with it — pointed out that economist Dean Baker and other experts had skewered the report of the commission co-chairs as "fundamentally flawed."

Tonight, Rose will feature Baker—who works with the the Center for Economic and Policy Research—on his program, along with Illinois Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, a member of the deficit commission who has developed a progressive alternative to the Simpson-Bowles proposal. Unlike the co-chairs, Schakowsky protects Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

FAIR’s claiming victory—graciously.

 "FAIR thanks those who wrote to the Charlie Rose Show and encouraged them to expand their guest list. And the Charlie Rose show should be commended for taking these criticisms seriously," the group announced this afternoon. "The fact that the program is broadening its discussion is a testament to the power of media activism."

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x