WTF! GOP Goes WWF! But Even $25 Million Can’t Buy a Lot of Love

WTF! GOP Goes WWF! But Even $25 Million Can’t Buy a Lot of Love

WTF! GOP Goes WWF! But Even $25 Million Can’t Buy a Lot of Love

Free-spending candidates won big primaries Tuesday, but it wasn’t pretty.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Connecticut Republicans have got their celebrity smackdown nominee for the US Senate—whether they want her or not.

Most of them, it turns out, would have preferred not to nominate World Wrestling Federation executive Linda McMahon. She could not muster even half the GOP primary vote Tuesday, despite spending more than $25 million on one of the most expensive Senate primary runs in history.

With over half the vote counted, McMahon had 49 percent to 29 percent for former Congressman Rob Simmons and 22 percent for Ron Paul-ist businessman Peter Schiff.

Considering the fact that Simmons quit the race and then struggled with whether to get back in until the last minute—when it was still unclear whether he was fully committed to the run—McMahon’s finish counts as a technical win. And an ugly one at that, since many leading Republicans and conservatives commentators expressed open dismay with her candidacy in the late stages of a primary that tended to be more focused on revelations regarding the WWF than the task of defeating Democrat Richard Blumenthal.

Blumenthal’s well ahead in the polls and the Democratic National Committee was celebrating the McMahon "win" with a press release that declared: “Today the party of Bob Dole, Jack Kemp and Dick Lugar nominated a candidate who kicks men in the crotch, thinks of scenes of necrophilia as ‘entertainment,’ and runs an operation where women are forced to bark like dogs. This is what has become of the once grand old party.”

Ouch!

But Democrats also had their money moment Tuesday, as Colorado’s appointed Senator Michael Bennet parlayed a 5-1 spending advantage over challenger Andrew Romanoff—the former state House Speaker and favorite of grassroots party activists who sold own home to stay in the running against a wealthy free-spending foe—into a narrow 54-46 win in that state’s Democratic primary.

Bennet also had the backing of President Obama, which may have been a definitional factor for the appointee whose background in business and as a school administrator provided fodder for a number of newspaper investigations. He now faces a tough fall race with Republican Ken Buck, a Tea Party favorite who beat the pick of the national GOP (former Lt. Governor Jane Norton) in a close race Tuesday.

By most traditional standards, Republican McMahon and Democrat Bennet may be weak nominees. But don’t count either one out this fall. They’ve both got money—and money, more than party or ideology, is proving to be the most powerful force in primaries from California to New England during the first stage of this volatile election year.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x