Teach For America More Competitive Than Ever

Teach For America More Competitive Than Ever

Teach For America More Competitive Than Ever

The fact that college graduates are drawn to public service programs, even if it is because they might be waiting out a poor economy, is encouraging.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

This article is cross-posted from CampusProgress where it originally appeared.

An article in the New York Times from yesterday points out that, Teach for America, while controversial among some, is a more popular option among graduating college seniors than ever. TFA applicants are up about 32 percent from last year, many applying as early as August last year — well before the deadline.

The article attributes the renewed interest in the federal teaching program to a down economy, saying TFA hired more graduating seniors than any other single employer this year. The applicants also come from some of the top schools in the nation: Harvard, Yale, and UC-Berkeley.

TFA has become competitive; it creates an effect of teaching becoming an extremely desirable job — something that school districts struggled with for years. However, some critics to say that not all TFA teachers-in-training stick with it, since more than 80 percent of TFA teachers leave teaching within three years. Many leave the program to attend law or business school or go on to take highly paid consulting gigs. But a new proposal suggests that TFA should ask for a five-year commitment instead of just two years.

Still, the fact that college graduates are drawn to public service programs, even if it is because they might be waiting out a poor economy, is encouraging. Experiences in a program like TFA will likely diversify the experiences of the young people in the program, allowing them firsthand experience with children from different backgrounds. At least, that’s the hope, anyway.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x