It is Time for Obama and the Rest of Us to “Ring In The True”

It is Time for Obama and the Rest of Us to “Ring In The True”

It is Time for Obama and the Rest of Us to “Ring In The True”

Ring out the old, ring in the new,

Ring, happy bells, across the snow:

The year is going, let him go;

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Ring out the old, ring in the new,

Ring, happy bells, across the snow:

The year is going, let him go;

Ring out the false, ring in the true.

So wrote Alfred, Lord Tennyson, one hundred and sixty years ago, as the 1840s gave way to the 1850s.

New Year’s Day has always been regarded as a moment of transition.

And a New Year’s Day that marks the close of one decade and the opening of another – as by many measures this one does – always seems to matter a little more.

So, yes, let us ring out the false. No decade was more characterized by falsehood, deception, spin, moral relativity and the evilest of all lies — compromise — than the 2000s, a decade that began with the selection of George Bush as president. Then came the structuring of U.S. economic policies to redistribute wealth upward, the false bubbles, the Enron cover-ups, the undeclared and unnecessary wars, the denials of ecological and social realities and finally the bank bailout, factory closings and double-digit unemployment.

It would have been nice to say that the 2000s ended a little early, with the replacement on January 20, 2009, of George Bush with Barack Obama.

Unfortunately, Obama has yet to “ring in the true.”

Yes, of course, he’s better than Bush.

Goodness, Bush’s dad was better than Bush. Reagan was better than Bush. Nixon was better than Bush. That’s not the point.

The point is to be dramatically better than Bush, dramatically better than all the falsehoods associated with his name.

The disappointment so many Americans feel with regard to Obama’s presidency has everything to do with his failure to make a big enough break with Bush and Bushism. But one year does not make a presidency, and Obama can still be the “transformational president”his country so demands. He need only recognize the full requirement of such a presidency. Tennyson points the way.

Ringing in the true is not about putting a better person in charge.

Ringing in the true is about putting better policies – fundamentally, unquestionably better policies – in place.

American does not need a health-care compromise. American needs single-payer health care and Medicare for all.

America does not need rhetoric about civil liberties, talk about closing Gitmo and tinkering around the edges of the Patriot Act. America needs a renewal of our commitment to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

America does not need a better-managed occupation of Afghanistan, America needs to stop trying to be the British empire of the 21st century.

America does not need bank bailouts and free-trade fantasies. America needs to tip the balance away from Wall Street and back toward Main Street.

America does not need to wait for word from Copenhagen – or Beijing. America needs to join the enlightened nations of the world in responding to the proven threats posed by climate change and environmental degeneration.

Ring out the false! Yes, indeed, that’s necessary.

But that is not enough.

It is time to ring in the new. It is time to end the 2000s, to put that miserable decade behind us, and to realize the promise of the American experiment that George Bush put on hold – and of an American dream too long deferred.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x