Introducing: Washington Post Watch

Introducing: Washington Post Watch

Today we unveil a new weekly feature called Washington Post Watch, though given the shoddiness of the WaPo’s editorial pages we might as well call it Shooting Fish in a Barrel.

I didn’t notify the Washington Post we were starting up the feature this week, but they were kind enough to provide us with a big fat target in Kathleen Parker’s latest column.

Now you may be familiar with Parker’s recent column, nicely gutted by Glenn Greenwald, in which she laid out an extended apologia for a kind of blood and soil nationalism that flirts obscenely with good old fashioned white supremacy in passages such as this:

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Today we unveil a new weekly feature called Washington Post Watch, though given the shoddiness of the WaPo’s editorial pages we might as well call it Shooting Fish in a Barrel.

I didn’t notify the Washington Post we were starting up the feature this week, but they were kind enough to provide us with a big fat target in Kathleen Parker’s latest column.

Now you may be familiar with Parker’s recent column, nicely gutted by Glenn Greenwald, in which she laid out an extended apologia for a kind of blood and soil nationalism that flirts obscenely with good old fashioned white supremacy in passages such as this:

What they know is that their forefathers fought and died for an America that has worked pretty well for more than 200 years. What they sense is that their heritage is being swept under the carpet while multiculturalism becomes the new national narrative. And they fear what else might get lost in the remodeling of America.

“Worked pretty well for more than 200 years?” Really?

As far as I can tell that gem of a column never managed to make it into the august pages of the Washington Post, but sadly this column, about Edwards’ recent endorsement of Obama did.

Most of the column is perfectly stale slander directed at trial lawyers, but the lede is what wins Parker her star turn in this week’s Washington Post Watch:

Well, at least they didn’t kiss.

I was bracing myself for the lip lock Wednesday when John Edwards endorsed Barack Obama.

You’ll remember that Ann Coulter made essentially the same “joke” a while back, though with language that wouldn’t pass muster with the WaPo’s editors. But just because the word “faggot” didn’t appear in Parker’s column doesn’t mean she wasn’t trading on the concept. Maybe it’s only a matter of time until the Washington Post Writers Group adds Ann Coulter to its fine roster as well.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x