Edwards Wins Colbert ‘Debate’

Edwards Wins Colbert ‘Debate’

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama both appeared Thursday night on Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report.”

Clinton mocked her “3 a.m.” ad. After fixing a malfunctioning projection screen and having a make-up artist address the challenge of Colbert’s “too shiny” forehead, the host gasped, “Senator Clinton, you’re so prepared for any situation.”

“I just love solving problems. Call me anytime. Call me at 3:00 a.m.,” said Clinton.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama both appeared Thursday night on Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report.”

Clinton mocked her “3 a.m.” ad. After fixing a malfunctioning projection screen and having a make-up artist address the challenge of Colbert’s “too shiny” forehead, the host gasped, “Senator Clinton, you’re so prepared for any situation.”

“I just love solving problems. Call me anytime. Call me at 3:00 a.m.,” said Clinton.

Obama added manufactured political “distractions” to host Stephen Colbert’s “On Notice Board.”

Reflecting on debate questioning about whether he wears a flag pin, Obama added “manufactured political distractions” to Colbert’s “On Notice” board list of troubling phenoms.

“I think the American people are tired of these games and petty distractions,” declared Obama, to Colbert’s response: “Speaking for the news media, we are not tired of it, It allows us to ask the same questions over and over again, and we don’t have to do any work.”

So who won?

John Edwards.

The candidate of the adult wing of the Democratic party who didn’t make it to Pennsylvania — but who looks better and better in hindsight — suddenly appeared during Colbert’s faux news report on the courting by Clinton and Obama of white male voters.

“Finally, America’s white men are being heard, and the candidates are attempting to address” issues of concern to them, Colbert said, as images of Clinton downing a shot and a beer and Obama attempting to bowl.

Mocking the efforts of both remaining candidates to secure his support, the former senator from North Carolina declared, “No white male vote is being courted more vigorously than this one.”

Weighing his options, Edwards noted that, on the one hand, he did not want to cast a vote that was “anti-hope.” But, recalling the response of a particularly virulent Clinton backer to former candidate Bill Richardson’s endorsement of Obama, Edwards said, “On the other hand, I don’t want James Carville to bite me.”

Restating his campaign call for a more serious focus on economic issues — which were almost entirely missing from Wednesday night’s debate — Edwards announced that he would vote in the upcoming North Carolina primary for the candidate who best advocates for ending poverty and providing universal health care.

Failing that, he said, “I will only support the candidate who promises to make me a spy. That would be so cool.”

Even Colbert was cracking up.

Easily the least defensive and most good-humored “contender,” Edwards reminded everyone of what was lost when he left the race — and of why the remaining candidates really are still campaigning for his endorsement.

Watch the full segment on the Comedy Channel’s website. (There’s a commercial first, so be patient.)

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x