All About the War?

All About the War?

Rahm Emanuel, the hard-charging recent head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, isn’t usually a profile in contrition. But yesterday Emanuel admitted it was a mistake for him to dismiss Jack Murtha’s brave stand against the Iraq war last November.

“I was wrong, no doubt about it,” Emanuel told the New York Times.

Murtha’s dramatic break with the Bush Administration’s Iraq policy forced Democrats to take a position on the war–and ultimately embrace the issue during their campaigns in order to win.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Rahm Emanuel, the hard-charging recent head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, isn’t usually a profile in contrition. But yesterday Emanuel admitted it was a mistake for him to dismiss Jack Murtha’s brave stand against the Iraq war last November.

“I was wrong, no doubt about it,” Emanuel told the New York Times.

Murtha’s dramatic break with the Bush Administration’s Iraq policy forced Democrats to take a position on the war–and ultimately embrace the issue during their campaigns in order to win.

Now Murtha is running for House Majority Leader against pro-war centrist Steny Hoyer. Because Murtha is to the right of Hoyer on issues like guns and abortion (last year he earned a 0 percent rating from NARAL and an A from the NRA), he is counting on the war to give him the support of liberal Democrats.

“Jack Murtha’s leadership sparked last night’s victory and has given Democrats control of Congress for the first time in a dozen years,” Arianna Huffington blogged on Wednesday. “Now they have to complete the end-the-Iraq-debacle mission the voters have given them. And Murtha’s the leader who can take them the rest of the way.”

Will House Democrats overlook Murtha’s conservative tendencies and vote based primarily on the war? The leadership elections are scheduled for Thursday, November 16. I’ll be watching, and writing, more. In the meantime, tell us who you’d support in the comments section.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x