Max Baucus’s Party?

Max Baucus’s Party?

The Republicans may now be “the party of no,” but it remains to be seen who exactly the Democrats are.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

AP Images
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. talks with reporters on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2009.

If ever there was a defining moment for the Democratic Party post-Bush, it is right now, with healthcare reform hanging in the balance.

The party has a popular president, a strong majority in the House and a filibuster-proof sixty-member caucus in the Senate. It also has 72 percent of all Americans–including 87 percent of Democrats and 50 percent of Republicans–saying they want a public plan option to compete with the waste and greed of private, for-profit plans.

Only the Democrats could blow this one. And if they do, there will be plenty of blame to spread around. Starting with Senator Max Baucus.

Baucus has emerged as perhaps the greatest obstacle to achieving a robust public plan. Along with the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, the Finance Committee he chairs is tasked with drafting the Senate’s healthcare bill. There was an early omen when Baucus blackballed single-payer advocates from his “roundtable discussions”–billed as including all stakeholders–and even had some of them arrested.

It would be easy enough to dismiss him as a sellout–after all, since 1989 the healthcare industry has lavished Baucus with $3,820,031, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Only President Obama, former presidential candidates John McCain and John Kerry, and Senator Arlen Specter are greater beneficiaries. Baucus has received $1,078,605 from pharmaceuticals, third in Congress; $1,377,776 from health professionals, eleventh in Congress; $667,099 from health insurance companies, fifth in Congress; and $414,042 from hospitals, eighth in Congress.

And these days, there are so many former Baucus staffers among the healthcare industry lobbyists now being paid a jaw-dropping $1.4 million per day that when they walk the halls of Congress it looks like a Baucus Reunion Tour.

But big bucks aside, it could be that this is simply who Sen. Baucus is. This is, after all, the same guy who just months ago voted to continue regressive, Bush-like tax policies with a new $100 billion-plus break for the wealthiest two-tenths of 1 percent of Americans. (The measure was defeated.) So it should come as little surprise that he and his Republican-dominated “Coalition of the Willing” will now offer an essentially Republican bill–with windfall profits in the billions for the insurance and drug companies–at a moment when the nation is demanding real reform and a clean break from profit-driven healthcare.

Fortunately, there will be a decent public plan option offered by the HELP Committee. Right now, not even the senators know the process for rectifying the two bills. It will be up to Majority Leader Harry Reid to channel his inner LBJ and start doing some serious, no-holds-barred arm-twisting to:

1) make sure the final bill includes HELP’s public plan option;

and

2) make sure his sixty-member caucus votes to end the GOP filibuster, even if the Baucuses, Landrieus and Nelsons then vote against the final bill.

Reid had better find out what those senators on the fence covet–and tell them that if they don’t vote for cloture, they can kiss whatever it is they want goodbye.

The Republicans may now be “the party of no,” but it remains to be seen who exactly the Democrats are. Is it the party of soaring rhetoric but corporate values? The party of expediency? Or is it the party that–when everything is going its way–will stand up and fight for the people?

We’re about to find out.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x