It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

The Frank budget has not been embraced by the Democratic leadership–and is unlikely to be so welcomed. The Democratic Party still hasn’t caught on; it remains a body at war with itself.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This is an excerpt from a column that originally appeared in the issue of December 25, 1989.

The Frank budget has not been embraced by the Democratic leadership–and is unlikely to be so welcomed. The Democratic Party still hasn’t caught on; it remains a body at war with itself. Last month Senator Charles Robb, a leader of the Democratic Leadership Council, issued a broadside against those whom he may as well have called out-of-the- closet liberals. Speaking in readily decipherable code, he decried his party for “expanding government for the benefit of special interests” instead of “expanding opportunities for ordinary Americans.” By “special interests” he did not mean the robber barons of the savings and loan industry. When I asked his press secretary if Robb could explain the difference between “ordinary Americans” and “special interests,” she paused and then promised to get back to me. The promise wasn’t kept, but then it didn’t need to be.

Robb’s speech was vapid. “We can become the architects of a fundamental redirection of our national priorities,” he huffed. But he’s an architect without a blueprint. He bemoaned Congress’s preoccupation with such symbolic is-sues as arts funding and flag burning, but could do no more than urge his party to “build a new agenda on mainstream values.” Change D.L.C. to D.P.L., for Democratic Party Lite: great tasting themes and no filling details. Alas, for Robb, with the changes in the East, the D.P.L. crowd has lost half its brief against those liberals who once were derisively termed McGovernite. (Remember Les Aspin’s snotty remark in July when the House approved a scaled-back Pentagon budget: “We’ve got a Michael Dukakis budget.”) The best Robb can do now is show that he is not as crass as Lee Atwater in playing the race card. While attacking “speciid interests,” he neverthelessclaims his is the party to give hope to the impoverished, deal with the housing crisis, expand health and child care. But, unlike Frank and the black caucus, the architect has nothing concrete to offer.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x