Say Goodbye, Joe

Say Goodbye, Joe

The demise of Lieberman’s campaign should represent the end of the line for the DLC.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Upon his departure from the presidential race, Joe Lieberman was accorded editorial praise for his “sober style” and his “grace.” The Wall Street Journal attributed the failure of its favorite Democrat to his “moderation,” suggesting that Democrats were simply too rabid to accept centrist policies that might defeat George W. Bush.

But the demise of the designated candidate of the Democratic Leadership Council merits a closer look. Lieberman started out leading in the polls, enjoying both universal name recognition as Al Gore’s running mate and easy access to cash. And he got the race he wanted: Democrats, by all accounts, are voting with their heads rather than their hearts, seeking to choose someone who can beat Bush rather than someone they love.

But Lieberman and his DLC positioning failed even this test. Democrats understandably want someone who will take Bush on, not echo him. Lieberman positioned himself to the right of Bush on pre-emptive war, corporate-defined trade policies and as a scold on morals and deficits. Like the DLC, he seemed to find his voice only when assailing other Democrats. His only memorable quote was to accuse Howard Dean of being in a “spider hole” for saying, accurately, that Saddam Hussein’s capture didn’t make us any safer. (The month after Hussein’s capture featured continued US casualties in Iraq, and repeated domestic alerts and scares.)

Joe never got it. With Bush and the right mugging the country, Democrats–and independents–have neither patience nor sympathy with DLC push-off politics and triangulated positioning. They couldn’t cotton to a hairshirt Democrat who put deficit reduction above help on healthcare, and corporate free trade above jobs. And they couldn’t fathom why someone running for President spent more time sounding like a Beltway pundit carping about others’ political strategy rather than laying out where he would take the country.

Now even the artful dodgers at the DLC are embracing the “right kind of populism,” but Joe left the campaign as he ran it, warning that Democrats were “drifting towards outdated class-warfare arguments,” apparently oblivious of the Bush Administration’s assault on working and poor people. But the early withdrawal of Joe Lieberman demonstrates that Democrats have had their fill of the poisonous politics that the DLC has come to represent.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x