Obama’s Budget: More Guns, Less Butter

Obama’s Budget: More Guns, Less Butter

Obama’s Budget: More Guns, Less Butter

A budget plan that cuts over 200 federal programs and expands military spending reveals the president’s misplaced priorities.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

When President Obama announced his budget plan this month, he proposed cutting or eliminating over 200 federal programs and expanding military spending and funding for the construction of nuclear power plants. The Nation‘s John Nichols joined Democracy Now! today to talk about the president’s misplaced priorities.

The proposal includes cutting half of the funding for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance program, money that will have to be made up for by already-strained state, county and municipal governments, Nichols says.

“The LIHEAP program is not some… benefit that the government throws out if it’s got a little extra money. It’s life and death. This is something that decides whether people can heat their homes in frigid climates. It’s also something that really decides whether communities can maintain their services. Remember, we’re talking about places that don’t have a choice on whether you’re going to use home heating oil, whether you’re going to use heating oil to heat your schools and your community centers. You have to do it," he says.

When he announced the program, Obama explained that these cuts will bring domestic discretionary spending to the lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president.

“I wish President Obama would remember what Dwight Eisenhower said about defense spending versus domestic spending. Dwight Eisenhower said, every time you buy a bomb, every time you pay for a bullet, that’s money that comes out of building a school or putting a roof on a house. I just think the President is making a lot of wrong choices here,” Nichols says.

Sara Jerving

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x