The Most Cowardly Republicans of All Are Quietly Hoping Trump Loses
The real problem with the Trump-loses scenario is that it relies on rejection by actual voters. And getting the MAGA faithful to turn their backs on him is likely a lost cause.

Former president Donald Trump at a campaign event in Potterville, Michigan, in August 2024.
(Bill Pugliano / Getty Images)
Conservative commentator Erick Erickson is not the sharpest knife in the drawerââIâm okay with being the object of scorn from morons,â is his bio on the site I still call Twitter. Every once in a while, though, he comes up with an interesting observation. Last week he tweeted about having an increasing number of âprivate conversationsâ with Republicans who are secretly hoping former president Donald Trump loses this November.
âIf Trump gets in, we set back the pro-life cause and free markets by a generation at least,â Ericksonâs âsourceâ told him. Trumpâs flip-flops on abortionâhe was against Floridaâs six-week abortion ban before he was for it, admitting heâd vote against a referendum establishing abortion rights in the stateâhave worried the extreme anti-choice right, and his promise of increased tariffs rattle free-marketeers. âNo amount of bullying [by Trump supporters saying] âbut youâre helping Harrisâ is going to fix this,â his post closes. âOnly Trump pivoting can.â
Ah, thereâs the undying hope for that pivot again! So-called âreasonable Republicansâ have been waiting for Trump to pivot away from overt racism, cruelty, sexist attacks on women, and increasingly batshit crazy âthreadsâ of mental effluvia since he declared his candidacy more than nine years ago. It hasnât happened, and it wonât.
In fact, I might dismiss Ericksonâs âprivate conversationsâ if Politicoâs Jonathan Martin hadnât reported the same story today. Neither Ericksonâs post nor Martinâs article, unfortunately, name namesâthatâs the point of the âsecretâ whispering. âAsking around with Republicans last week, the most fervent private debate I came across in the party was how best to accelerate Trumpâs exit to the 19th Hole,â he wrote. Some thought the party could survive a Kamala Harris presidency, especially if the GOP takes the Senate.
âOne high-level Republican,â Martin added, âconceding it may only be âwishful thinking,â even floated the idea of a Harris victory followed by Biden pardons of both his son, Hunter, and Trump. That would take the issue of both cases off Harrisâs plate and, more to the point, drain the energy behind Trumpâs persecution complex so that Republicans can get on with the business of winning elections.â
Fat chance that a woman running on her record as a prosecutor will âpardon Trump.â And itâs not her responsibility to âdrain the energyâ from his persecution mania; itâs the responsibility of Republicans who know betterâthat the 2020 election was not stolen, that January 6 was an attempted coupâto do that.
The real problem with the Trump-loses scenario is that it relies on rejection by actual voters. I believe this is possible, and increasingly likely, but it will be the result of mobilizing the Democratsâ base and persuading independents, not converting the MAGA faithful. âYouâre assuming Republicans have a top of the ticket problem and not a voter base problem,â Terry Sullivan, a former GOP strategist and Senator Marco Rubioâs 2016 campaign manager, told Martin. âItâs not like our leaders have been leading the voters to the wilderness against the votersâ judgment.â
Voters are where they are now, but how they got there is somewhat debatable. Ever since the election of our first Black president, Barack Obama, Republicans have been feeding the base a pretty steady diet of red meatâDonald Trump started the âbirtherâ smear, but stalwart, principled Mitt Romney made birther jokes, too. He and his running mate, Representative Paul Ryan, painted Obamacare as a welfare program that was stealing funds from Medicare, with not-so-subtle racial coding. Sullivanâs former employer, Rubio, began as a Trump opponent only to become one of his chief defenders, even winding up a finalist for the VP slot that went to hapless JD Vance. National and local party leaders have become increasingly comfortable stoking white fear and grievance, whether under code terms like âcritical race theoryâ and âdiversity, equity and inclusion,â and âreplacement theory,â as though whites are an increasingly threatened minority in their own country.
Letâs make clear: Iâm not calling anyone animals. But it makes me think of pit bulls. Most dog trainers believe they arenât inherently violent or aggressive, and can be trained to be loving family pets. Iâve met plenty. On the other hand, some owners breed them for cruelty. In a way, thatâs what the steady diet of white grievance has done to MAGA voters. And now these cowardly Republicans are afraid theyâll be mauled; thatâs why theyâre only whispering their reservations about Trump.
Plenty of Republicans have done the decent thing and made their way either out of the party entirely, or at least out of Trumpâs thrall: George Conway, Tara Setmeyer, Rick Wilson, Tim Miller, Charlie Sykes, Cindy McCain, Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, Tom Nichols⌠itâs a long list. You could follow their path. Or you can continue to snivel to friends and reporters who will keep your confidence.
Thereâs a saying about the virtue in putting âcountry over party,â for the good of all Americans. This isnât even putting âparty over country,â because theyâre admitting Trump is hurting their party. I donât entirely know what to call it, since Iâve already used the word âcowardlyâ too many times. âPatheticâ comes to mind.
Become a Sustaining Donor This September
Between the reemergence of right-wing red-baiting and Donald Trumpâs use of the chilling National Security Presidential Memorandumâ7 to criminalize left political organizing, weâre seeing McCarthyism reborn before our eyes.
This assault on democracy cannot be ignored or wished away. Resisting it requires bravery in the face of threats and repression, a steadfast commitment to the truth, and the unwavering belief that we canâand willâovercome this darkness.
We must have an independent media that sets the record straight, unearths corruption and abuses of power, and advances a politics of justice and dignity for all if weâre to win this fight.
Thatâs why Iâm writing to you today. This September, The Nation needs to add 100 monthly donors to sustain our progressive journalism. Your contribution makes the next investigative report, the next truth-speaking column, and the next pathbreaking essay all possible.
I hope youâll support our work with a recurring donation today. If you donate $10 or more a month, weâll send you a brand new âHands Off the Free Press!â sticker to recognise your commitment to our cause. Please, donate today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation
