Elegy for a Poet Who Loved Sneakers

Elegy for a Poet Who Loved Sneakers

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

 

I didn’t know who you were, and then you died.
I went searching for your poems online
devouring one after another then reading
your Twitter feed backwards, your voice getting
younger and younger, and that’s where I found
the last pair of sneakers you ever bought: all-black
AirMax 90s. I have a black pair, too,
and a pair that are pink and teal. I don’t wear
either of them enough, and that’s one problem
with loving sneakers. The more you obsess over
them, the more you buy, and the less you wear
each pair. In college my friend Arshad told me
that every year you add to your life, the shorter
each one is in relation to the total, the significance
of each day diminishing as you collect them.
Goddamn, I said, but kept wanting days
to be over so I could get to the next one.
If I had found your poems just a few months earlier
I could have emailed you. You asked people
to do that. You’d worked in a casino
and said you’d teach them the right way to play
blackjack. We could have talked about cards and then
shoes and then basketball. We would have gotten
to poems eventually, or we wouldn’t have.
There’s nothing new about poems, and no one
knows the right way to write them. Now
I’m watching a craft talk you gave about the body—
how we feel it before we know it’s failing—
and that’s what it is about sneakers, isn’t it?
They’re part of the body, but they come off.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

x