The State Lawsuit That Could Set a Precedent for Nationwide Student-Loan Refunds

The State Lawsuit That Could Set a Precedent for Nationwide Student-Loan Refunds

The State Lawsuit That Could Set a Precedent for Nationwide Student-Loan Refunds

What is certain is that borrowers will continue to pay the price if student-loan companies aren’t held accountable.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Anyone with a student loan knows what it’s like to be given the runaround by their loan-servicing company. It turns out that this may be more by design than you may have suspected. Lawsuits against one of the largest servicers of federal student loans, Navient, have garnered headlines in recent weeks. Following the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s groundbreaking lawsuit against the company in 2017, four additional states have followed suit, including California, in an effort to enforce state consumer laws and protect student-loan borrowers from unscrupulous business practices.

Navient, a publicly traded company hired by the Department of Education to service over $100 billion in federal student loans, is the most criticized company in consumer finance. Now, one of the most consumer-friendly states in America is taking the company to court. Should California Attorney General Xavier Becerra prove successful, attorneys general around the country willing to take a stand against Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and her efforts to decimate state-level student-loan protections would be able to use this as a model to check abusive student-loan companies.

At a press conference last month, Attorney General Becerra detailed half a dozen allegations against Navient, including what is perhaps the most troubling breach of the company’s stated promise to aid borrowers in successful repayment. Instead of counseling for borrowers’ best financial interests, the lawsuit alleges, Navient systematically extracted money from struggling borrowers to maximize the company’s bottom line.

In other words, instead of giving financially distressed borrowers the option to enroll in income-driven repayment plans, for which the vast majority of federal student-loan borrowers are eligible, the company incentivized call representatives to push borrowers into repeated forbearances, thereby increasing the interest accrued and later capitalizing on borrowers’ loans.

Navient is required by its contract with the Department of Education to inform borrowers of all the repayment options available to borrowers and to readily facilitate payment-plan changes. Documents referenced in California’s lawsuit indicate the company often seemed to place struggling borrowers into multiple consecutive forbearances, paving a direct path for many of these same borrowers to eventually default on their loans—an entirely avoidable outcome, had the company done the job it was hired to do.

In the aftermath of the California lawsuit against the company, Navient has launched an aggressive public-relations campaign denying the charges and painting itself as a victim of a bad student-loan system.

This is a sign that student-loan borrowers nationwide, facing setback after setback from the DeVos Department of Education, have reason to pay attention to this lawsuit in particular. While the company beefs up on lobbyists to defeat state bills giving consumer protections to borrowers, states like California are stepping in where the Department of Education has neglected its duty to protect students. There’s evidence to believe that this lawsuit and others like it could bring the kind of relief indebted borrowers around the country have been seeking for years.

Further, the timing of the litigation is important to 12 million Americans who have their loans serviced by Navient. In recent weeks, the CFPB submitted court filings claiming that Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is actively blocking the federal investigators from accessing Navient documents that would help the government pinpoint the identity and scope of those harmed.

At a time when wages are stagnant and the burden of student debt is increasing for every generation of Americans, loan servicers must be held accountable for predatory practices that are making repayment unnecessarily burdensome and expensive. We risk leaving whole generations behind if we don’t enforce laws on the books designed to keep bad actors in check, especially when it comes to financial products. What is certain is that borrowers will continue to pay the price if student-loan companies aren’t held accountable.

[Borrowers that are victims of Navient’s fraud and abuse should contact the California attorney general’s office to share their story and to find out if they are eligible for relief. Complaints can be filed at oag.ca.gov/report or (800) 952-5225.]

Correction: An earlier version of this article mistakenly said that Navient filed for a motion to dismiss the California case. In fact, Navient attempted to dismiss the CFPB federal suit, not the California case.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x