Alternative Explanations for Trump’s Outrageous Statements

Alternative Explanations for Trump’s Outrageous Statements

Alternative Explanations for Trump’s Outrageous Statements

The standard line is that he’s simply a pathological liar and braggart. But maybe he has the gift of macro vision.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Incident: Despite many photographs plainly showing the contrary, Donald Trump insisted that his inaugural crowd was the largest in history.

Widely accepted view: He often lies, even when the evidence that he’s lying is readily available.

Alternative explanation: Donald Trump suffers from an affliction similar to but much more severe than double vision. It’s called macro vision, and it means that he “sees” a multiplicity of objects where relatively few exist. The condition is exacerbated by stress. It is thought that Trump was particularly stressed during the inaugural weekend, partly because of the refusal of big-name stars to entertain at the inaugural ball even though he knows Billy Joel. Macro vision is thought to be the reason Trump thinks he saw television coverage of thousands of New Jersey Muslims cheering the 9/11 attack. As far as can be determined, what he was looking at was a group of 12 to 14 cab-drivers, most of them Dominican, cheering a three-run homer while listening to a baseball game on a car radio. Doctors are not certain whether macro vision is involved in Trump’s habit of claiming that he has a lot more money than he really has.

Incident: Despite nearly nonstop coverage of chaos at airports all over the world, Trump said the rollout of his travel ban was a success, with only 109 people denied entry. Homeland Security said the number was 721.

Widely accepted view: He is incapable of admitting mistakes.

Alternative explanation: Donald Trump did not realize that the chaotic crowds at airports shown on television were unusual. Having long ago given up flying on anything but a private plane, he hasn’t been in the commercial area of an airport for many years. He believes people who fly commercial are losers, and why would you want to let a bunch of losers into your country? The difference between his figures and Homeland Security’s figures is that they counted losers.

Incident: Despite remarkably consistent statements from a dozen women, Donald Trump said he had not actually done the groping he bragged about on the Access Hollywood tape.

Widely accepted view: Actually, he had. He was lying again.

Alternative explanation: He made up those groping incidents in a desperate attempt to impress Billy Bush. Before Trump meets someone for the first time, he spends two or three hours sorting through his boasts to see what it might be appropriate to brag about. (It is not true that he has a short attention span; when the subject is himself, he has a long attention span.) “I’ll tell him that I know Billy Joel,” Trump thought. Then it dawned on Trump that Billy Bush knew a lot of famous people himself. Otherwise why would he be known among the unkind in Hollywood as Sidney Suckup? “I know,” Trump thought, “I’ll tell him that I have dated 483 models, by actual count, and that I have more gold bathroom fixtures than anyone in Palm Beach. No one else is even close.” But that sounded sort of lame, even after he came up with a figure of how many of the models had used the gold bathroom fixtures. He pondered. Then he thought, “I’ve got it. I’ll tell him that when you’re a star you can grab women by their pussy.”

Incident: The day after tweeting that his widely panned speech at the CIA had received a standing ovation (the audience, not having been invited to sit down, had been standing from the start), Trump said to business leaders at the White House, “I’m a very big person when it comes to the environment. I have received awards on the environment.” As far as the Washington Post fact-checkers could discover, he has never received an award on the environment.

Widely accepted view: He can lie and boast at the same time.

Alternative explanation: Knowing how much Trump craves attention, his employees presented him on his 50th birthday with a mock award—a trophy that said “Best Boss.” The next morning, he asked his secretary where the day’s award was. So the employees quickly came up with another trophy (“Longest Neckties.”) After 10 or 15 years of receiving an award every day, Trump lost the distinction between the make-believe awards and real awards. He genuinely believes that he has received environmental awards, since some of his daily awards were environmental—e.g., “Largest Swimming Pool.”

Incident: Although no evidence whatsoever has been offered to support this claim, Trump continues to say that he only lost the popular vote because 3-5 million undocumented immigrants voted and every one of them voted for Hillary Clinton.

Widely accepted view: He has an infantile inability to admit losing anything.

Alternative explanation: That’s the macro vision kicking in again.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x