The Story of Change

The Story of Change

Why conscious consumerism is a great place to start, but a terrible place to stop.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

When filmmaker and activist Annie Leonard set out in 2007 to share what she’d learned about the way we make, use and discard our “stuff,” she thought 50,000 hits would be a great audience for her “twenty-minute cartoon about trash.” Four years later, more than 15 million people had watched Leonard’s video, “The Story of Stuff,” making it the most watched environmental video of all time.

In early 2011, Leonard released “The Story of Citizens United,” the best short history of the growth of corporate power I’ve ever read, heard or seen.

She followed that up with “The Story of Broke,” an eight-minute animated movie that directly challenged those who argue that America is penniless and incapable of paying its bills, let alone making investments in a more sustainable and fair economy.

Now, Leonard is back with “The Story of Change,” a powerful and typically informed polemic imploring viewers to put down their credit cards and start exercising their citizenship to help build a more sustainable, just and fulfilling world.

Faced with daunting environmental and social problems with few easy solutions, many progressives resignedly conclude that the best they can do to influence change is to buy green or fair-trade products. In her new video, Leonard lauds conscious consumerism but rightly calls it a great place to start, but a terrible place to stop.

The six-minute film features an inspiring exploration of what effective changemaking has looked like through history—from Gandhi to the civil rights movement to the victories of the early environmental movement. It spotlights the elements found whenever and wherever people unite to make change: a big idea, a commitment to working together, and the ability and patience to turn that idea and commitment into meaningful action.

What’s striking about the movements Leonard highlights is that they all pushed fundamental change and they often did so while a majority of the population, as measured by public opinion polls and punditry, was arrayed against them, as Sami Grover makes clear in a good post at TreeHugger.

After watching, share the video with friends, family and your Facebook and Twitter communities; consider donating to the project and check out the “Story of Change” resource page for more info and tips on getting involved.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x