The Price of the Baby Bump

The Price of the Baby Bump

The real problem with the Hollywood obsession with the celebrity baby bump is not what it shows but rather what it hides.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The real problem with our society’s obsession with the celebrity baby bump is not what it shows, but rather what it hides.

Jessica Simpson on the cover of Elle

Everywhere you turn, celebrity women are sporting the baby bump. Jessica Simpson shared her naked bump on the April cover of Elle. Actress Nia Long struck a similar pose on the cover of Ebony back in October. And both were clearly homages to Annie Leibovitz’s iconic Demi Moore photo of 1991.

In the case of 2012’s most famous new mom, R&B diva Beyoncé, “the absence of evidence” of her bump led to maelstrom of Internet rumors. Blogs questioning the legitimacy of her pregnancy were so cruel, her younger sister, Solange, took to Twitter to defend her.

Even I got caught up. Now in my first pregnancy, I went through great lengths to insure that I was bump couture. Vintage empire waist dresses, trips to Rosie Pope Maternity store and my infatuation with well-dressed celebrity mom made the last nine months a fashion feast.

Only one caveat: my bump came with no lucrative endorsement deals, fashion lines or Oxygen reality shows. I was not part of the “growing number of underemployed actresses, singers and would-be entrepreneurs” who are discovering, as New York Times writer Jacob Bernstein puts it, that “motherhood pays.”

For the vast majority of American women, however, pregnancy and childbirth make us more financially vulnerable, not less. Consider that women without children make ninety cents to a man’s dollar, mothers make seventy-three cents to a man’s dollar, and single moms make only about sixty cents to a man’s dollar. Race and ethnicity matter too. “At Rope’s End,” a report by NYU’s Women of Color Policy Network, found that black and Latino single mothers have a median wealth of zero, whereas white women report a median wealth of $6,000.

In our recession, single women mothers are most likely to be unemployed and as a result, their children are more likely to experience the devastating impacts of our stalled economy. Finally, a 2007 study from Cornell University showed that all things being equal—résumés and job experiences—mothers were offered $11,000 lower starting salaries than non-mothers. In contrast, fathers were offered $6,000 more in starting salaries than non-fathers.

Fortunately, organizations like the American Association of University Women and MomsRising respond to this great income disparity by lobbying Congress to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act, legislation that President Obama says “will help ensure that men and women who do equal work receive the equal pay that they and their families deserve." By creating stronger motivation for employers to base wage discrepancies on genuine business needs rather than gender and empowering women to negotiate for equal pay, the is a first step towards protecting mothers from workplace discrimination.

Until then, only for the chosen few does the baby bump mean a financial one.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x