Bruno: Offensive, Funny or Just Shocking?

Bruno: Offensive, Funny or Just Shocking?

Bruno: Offensive, Funny or Just Shocking?

The Nation‘s Richard Kim and others discuss the admittedly provocative antics of Sacha Baron Cohen’s latest creation.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Sacha Baron Cohen’s new film, <a
href=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAGpmNb2xfQ”>Brüno,
premiered in theaters on Friday to
mixed reviews. Several were offended by the admittedly provocative
antics of Cohen onscreen. But was it offending the wrong people?

Scores of people from the gay community have voiced their distaste for
Cohen’s depiction of homosexuals in the movie, fearing that his behavior
perpetuates common stereotypes and strengthens homophobic tendencies. A
scene where Bruno treats a baby like an accessory has especially angered
some, in a time when the gay community is having difficulty gaining
adoption rights.

Others disagree, saying Brüno’s character is an obvious cartoon version
of the ridiculous stereotypes that have been wrongly placed on
homosexuals.

But in the end, Brüno is a comedy, so is it funny? And if so, do we
laugh more from satire or sheer shock value?

Here to discuss these questions and more we have <a
href=”/blogs/notion/450642/et_tu_bruno”>Richard
Kim of The
Nation
, <a
href=”http://www.gbmnews.com/articles/3105/1/Antoine-B-Craigwell/Page1.
html”>Antoine B. Craigwell of <a
href=”http://www.gbmnews.com/”>GBMNews.com, and <a
href=”http://www.iloveblackmovies.com/AboutShawn.html”>Shawn
Edwards, creator
of <a
href=”http://www.iloveblackmovies.com/”>www.iloveblackmovies.com and
contributor at FoxTV.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x