Egypt’s Activists: I Wouldn’t Vote for the Islamists

Egypt’s Activists: I Wouldn’t Vote for the Islamists

Egypt’s Activists: I Wouldn’t Vote for the Islamists

The Western media’s focus on the importance of Islamist parties in the country’s political landscape is dangerously misplaced.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

After thirty years under President Hosni Mubarak’s iron grip on power, Cairo is alive with activism. In a roundtable earlier this month organized by PolicyMic.com and The Nation and moderated by author Stephen Glain, young Egyptian activists debated some of Egypt’s most pressing issues, including the role and strength of the Muslim Brotherhood, the power of social media in sparking reform and the military’s stranglehold over politics.

In this video, the activists explain that the Western media’s focus on the importance of Islamist parties in the country’s political landscape is dangerously misplaced. According to the activists, the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood and similar groups doesn’t hold much sway over the Egyptian public at large, and if anything, the wired and cosmopolitan protestors who led the effort to oust Mubarak shows that the Islamist’s influence is on the wain.  As Mohamed Abdelfattah explains, "I wouldn’t vote for the Islamists."

Be sure to also check out the other videos in this series on Egypt’s activists:
Democracy Is a Practical Process
Where Will the Money Come From?
Now I Tweet in Arabic

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x