Elizabeth Warren Says She’ll Consider Massachusetts Senate Run

Elizabeth Warren Says She’ll Consider Massachusetts Senate Run

Elizabeth Warren Says She’ll Consider Massachusetts Senate Run

Massachusetts might well elect Warren to the Senate, where she could lead the fight for reform.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

On Sunday, when President Obama let it be known that he would not appoint Elizabeth Warren as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, it was pretty clear that the Harvard law professor who has become a hero to progressives was going to need a new approach to Washington. It was equally clear that the logical approach was to consider making a run for Ted Kennedy’s old US Senate seat representing Massachusetts.

Warren agreed.

Asked Monday whether she would consider making a run for the seat now occupied by US Senator Scott Brown, R-Wall Street, Warren replied: “I’ve been working 14 hours a day on trying to stand this…agency up, really for more than a year now…. It’s time for a little vacation for me. When I go home, I’ll do more thinking then. But I need to do that thinking not from Washington.”

That’s more than enough encouragement for the Progressive Change Campaign Committee—long the chief champion for getting Warren into a bully pulpit where she can advocate in a meaningful way for consumer protection and real regulations on banks and speculators.

The PCCC has started a “Draft Elizabeth Warren for the U.S. Senate” campaign.

Quoting from Sunday’s Nation article outling arguments for a Warren run, the PCCC says: "Paul Wellstone used to say he could use ten more progressives in the Senate—‘or one Elizabeth Warren.’ Elizabeth Warren has a track record of holding Wall Street accountable and fighting for regular people like us. Now, she’s considering winning back Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat from Republican Scott Brown in 2012. Let’s tell her she’d have our support!"

Warren is considering making the run. That’s a prospect that will excite progressives—and scare Wall Street.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x