Nation Conversations: Jane McAlevey on Why Unions Are Not the Problem

Nation Conversations: Jane McAlevey on Why Unions Are Not the Problem

Nation Conversations: Jane McAlevey on Why Unions Are Not the Problem

Instead of giving in to the conservative campaign to demonize organized labor, progressives should push to secure higher benefits for all workers.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Instead of giving in to the conservative campaign to demonize organized labor, progressives should push to secure higher benefits for all workers.

This week, thousands of public employees, students and their allies flooded Wisconsin’s streets to protest Governor Scott Walker’s plan to take away workers’ right to collective bargaining. This very public display of workers’ power is a much-needed reinvigoration of a beleaguered labor movement, and as Jane McAlevey outlines in her article in this week’s issue of The Nation, could be the first step toward rebuilding an ethical American economy.

In states where unions are more difficult to form, quality of life drops across the board as it becomes more difficult for all workers to negotiate the terms of their employment. That’s why it’s so disheartening, McAlevey says in this interview with executive editor Betsy Reed, that many Americans have bought into the stereotypes peddled by the likes of Wisconsin’s Walker that union workers are “lazy” and “overpaid” drains on our economy.

As a union organizer in Nevada, McAlevey experienced this assault on workers firsthand. To counter the right’s well-funded attack, McAlevey and her colleagues chose to take a stand for the gains union workers had made over a half-century of hard negotiations. Instead of pushing the benefits of government workers down to the level of the private sector, McAlevey argued that we should instead fight to bring the benefits of all workers up to the same high level of protection and quality of life. What can workers across the country learn from McAlevey’s successes?

—Kevin Gosztola

Image courtesy of OPEIU

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x