A patient rests in a corridor waiting for a room at Providence Cedars-Sinai Tarzana Medical Center in California on January 3, 2021.(Apu Gomes / AFP via Getty)
NPR recently reported that in 2021 US life expectancy fell for a second year in a row. The average American lifespan is now 76 years—the lowest it’s been since 1996. This comes after a steady rise since World War II, thanks to improved medical care, education, and scientific breakthroughs.
No doubt Covid-19 played a significant role in this steep drop. But according to the same report, life expectancy in comparable nations slipped only slightly in 2020, and actually rebounded in 2021—not to mention that US life expectancy had already been significantly lagging behind those countries’.
If the pandemic was a test of nations’ health care infrastructure, America failed.
The United States claims to be the leader of the free world. We pride ourselves on democracy, education, and wealth, but these hold very little value if we can’t live long enough to enjoy them. And our falling life expectancy is no accident: It is a direct result, and failure, of policy.
Unsurprisingly, the drop in life expectancy has been disproportionate, reflecting existing socioeconomic inequalities. While life expectancy for white people dropped by 2.4 years, it fell by four years for Black people, and by 4.2 years for Hispanic people. For Indigenous people, it fell by 6.6 years to an average age of 65.2—what the overall US life expectancy was in 1944. Even if America’s overall drop in life expectancy could be attributed entirely to the pandemic, this discrepancy can’t; it’s a reflection of the unequal outcomes that have long defined our health care system.
Aside from Covid-19, the main causes of death in 2021 included drug overdoses, heart and liver disease, and suicide. But at the both the federal and state level, the US government is doing little to mitigate these crises; if anything, by restricting health care, right-wing demagogues are actively making it worse.
Take, for example, maternal mortality, which peaked in 2021 at 1,205 deaths—a 40 percent increase from 2020 and an almost 60 percent increase from 2019. That was before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, leading to a massive wave of states’ enacting abortion restrictions—and a Gender Equity Policy Institute report from earlier this year found that in states where abortion is banned, maternal deaths are nearly three times higher than in states that support the right to choose.
Then there are programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which combined provide care and insurance to more than 100 million Americans. Republicans want to gut that, too: Senator Rick Scott wants to require a congressional vote on funding those programs every five years. Senator Ron Johnson wants to do that annually. Senator John Thune supported funding cuts as recently as last November.
Addressing a group of supporters, Senator Mike Lee made his position perfectly clear: “It will be my objective to phase out Social Security. To pull it up by the roots, and get rid of it.”
But for all the hand-wringing about whether we can afford to invest in American health, the United States already spends thousands more per capita on health care than its peer countries do—it’s just that an enormous percentage of that cost is offloaded to American families in the form of insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses. Putting even more burden on individuals makes clear that in this country, it’s always wealth before health.
Between 1900 and 2013, American life expectancy shot up by more than 30 years. It’s no mystery why. Medical experts created antibiotics and learned how to treat cardiovascular disease. During World War II, the US Army partnered with scientists to help create the first influenza vaccine, while the War Production Board led a coalition to advance the development of penicillin. And President Lyndon B. Johnson signed Medicare and Medicaid into law, which researchers have credited with increasing life expectancy.
I know that many important organizations are asking you to donate today, but this year especially, The Nation needs your support.
Over the course of 2025, the Trump administration has presided over a government designed to chill activism and dissent.
The Nation experienced its efforts to destroy press freedom firsthand in September, when Vice President JD Vance attacked our magazine. Vance was following Donald Trump’s lead—waging war on the media through a series of lawsuits against publications and broadcasters, all intended to intimidate those speaking truth to power.
The Nation will never yield to these menacing currents. We have survived for 160 years and we will continue challenging new forms of intimidation, just as we refused to bow to McCarthyism seven decades ago. But in this frightening media environment, we’re relying on you to help us fund journalism that effectively challenges Trump’s crude authoritarianism.
For today only, a generous donor is matching all gifts to The Nation up to $25,000. If we hit our goal this Giving Tuesday, that’s $50,000 for journalism with a sense of urgency.
With your support, we’ll continue to publish investigations that expose the administration’s corruption, analysis that sounds the alarm on AI’s unregulated capture of the military, and profiles of the inspiring stories of people who successfully take on the ICE terror machine.
We’ll also introduce you to the new faces and ideas in this progressive moment, just like we did with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. We will always believe that a more just tomorrow is in our power today.
Please, don’t miss this chance to double your impact. Donate to The Nation today.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and publisher, The Nation
The math is simple: When governments give priority to health and medicine, we live longer. When you look at 10 peer countries—all with higher life expectancies—every one has government-funded health insurance. Why overcomplicate it? The key to improving life expectancy in the United States is to improve the affordability and accessibility of our health care.
That said, there is one group for whom American health care is excellent: the rich and powerful people who can afford it. One Harvard study found that the richest Americans get to live over a decade longer than the poorest Americans. Our politicians are living longer, too: We currently have the second-oldest Senate and third-oldest House of Representatives in history. The two oldest presidents to ever take office could be staging a rematch in 2024 to set a new record high. And our Supreme Court justices are well enough to take billionaire-funded trips around the world well into their 70s.
Our nation’s most privileged people—and the leaders who are living long and well—would be smart to make their quality of care available to all. If they refuse, voters should cut their career expectancy short.
Katrina vanden HeuvelTwitterKatrina vanden Heuvel is editor and publisher of The Nation, America’s leading source of progressive politics and culture. An expert on international affairs and US politics, she is an award-winning columnist and frequent contributor to The Guardian. Vanden Heuvel is the author of several books, including The Change I Believe In: Fighting for Progress in The Age of Obama, and co-author (with Stephen F. Cohen) of Voices of Glasnost: Interviews with Gorbachev’s Reformers.