Trump Is Using Pandemic Panic to Ramp Up Attacks on Migrants

Trump Is Using Pandemic Panic to Ramp Up Attacks on Migrants

Trump Is Using Pandemic Panic to Ramp Up Attacks on Migrants

This has nothing to do with public health and everything to do with locking out poor and brown people.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

EDITOR’S NOTE: The Nation believes that helping readers stay informed about the impact of the coronavirus crisis is a form of public service. For that reason, this article, and all of our coronavirus coverage, is now free. Please subscribe to support our writers and staff, and stay healthy.

The Signal this week: After ignoring the severity of the coronavirus threat to global health and the global economy for more than a month, and then underplaying the likelihood of community transmission in the United States, the Trump administration is now rushing to use the outbreak to further its political goals on immigration. Witness the discussions now underway to close the southern border, just when the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seems poised to block the ghastly Migrant Protection Protocols, which force tens of thousands of asylum seekers to remain in camps on the Mexican side of the border.

Fulfilling this Stephen Miller wish list has nothing to do with public health and everything to do with locking out poor and brown people. Like the Justice Department’s new Denaturalization Section, unveiled by the administration this week, which makes it easier to take US citizenship and passports away from naturalized citizens who have been convicted of crimes—this is part of a project to fundamentally redefine who should and shouldn’t be American. These actions are straight out of the fascist playbook, yet they were drowned out by other events. Surely it’s no coincidence that such an office was established in the shadows, at a time of pandemic panic, when it was guaranteed to receive little notice.

If the administration—which dismantled the country’s pandemic response systems in the first years of Trump’s presidency—were even remotely competent, it would be ramping up airport health checks and ensuring that passengers spend less time in long and densely packed airport lines. After all, “social spacing” is one of the few tools we have in the fight to slow the virus’s spread. Instead, the administration is pinching pennies. As the summer travel season nears, the Transportation Security Administration announced both a hiring freeze and a strict limit on overtime for existing staff.

Instead of getting the attention they deserve, these developments are being drowned out by the Noise: by Trump’s bleating about Democrats’ wanting open borders, and about the coronavirus being their “new hoax”; by Trump’s trolling the Democratic presidential hopefuls, holding rallies in primary states.

Meanwhile, Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, is leading a loyalty putsch, providing the administration with lists of officials it should purge for not being sufficiently enthusiastic about the person and policies of Trump.

In 2018, Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked Trump for talking dismissively about “Obama judges.” Roberts averred, “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.” That was disingenuous then, and it’s even more disingenuous now. Clearly, judicial appointments are political; and with a Supreme Court justice’s wife now demanding that civil servants essentially pass a presidential loyalty test, the idea that her husband—a reliable vote on behalf of every Trump policy that has come before the court these past three years—is a neutral arbiter is laughable.

Imagine the conservative howls of outrage if a close relative of Justice Sonia Sotomayor or Ruth Bader Ginsburg were to head a group demanding loyalty tests on behalf of Bernie Sanders. It’s unthinkable that Rush Limbaugh and his crowd wouldn’t be calling for heads to roll. Yet, in this degraded political environment, with Trump’s cult of personality, it’s considered OK for Ginni Thomas to act in this manner.

That’s the Signal. Stay strong and stay healthy—and don’t get distracted by the chatter.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x