An Exxon mobile gas station in Gutenberg N.J.(Kena Betancur / VIEWpress / Corbis / Getty Images)
Progressives in and out of Congress are leading a push to eliminate all subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, making a repeal of these multibillion-dollar giveaways a red line in the upcoming budget reconciliation package, the larger spending bill aimed at implementing most of President Joe Biden’s agenda. Environmentalists and left-leaning congressional Democrats are especially motivated to take on the oil and gas industries after a covertly recorded video, made in a Greenpeace sting this May, caught ExxonMobil lobbyists boasting about their efforts to sabotage climate initiatives in Washington.
Top Exxon lobbyist Keith McCoy bragged about having weekly access to West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin’s staff, named 10 other senators who have been “crucial” to watering down Biden’s infrastructure package, and made remarkably candid comments about how capitalism and Exxon’s profit-seeking caused a global calamity. The other lobbyist in the undercover video, Dan Easley, also touted the oil giant’s relationship with the Trump administration, describing how they worked together to protect profits, specifically pointing to their “preferential tax treatment,” or subsidies.
Washington Representative Pramila Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, says that ending fossil fuel subsidies is a “top five priority” for progressive lawmakers, alongside other “really bold action” on climate. “Now, you know this, every year the United States government gives away $20 billion to the fossil fuel industry in the form of these tax breaks, incentives, other subsidies, all for an industry that made $28 billion in profits just in 2018 alone,” she said during a recent Zoom session with Our Revolution. “So it’s a huge waste of taxpayer money and it is so harmful to our climate.”
This week, House Democrats Ro Khanna and Ilhan Omar led a letter to Democratic leadership demanding that the repeal of fossil fuel subsidies be included in any infrastructure package, according to a copy obtained by The Nation. “We should not fall for the industry myth that these subsidies are necessary for good job creation,” they wrote. “Despite the fact that big fossil fuel companies claimed $8.2 billion in 2020 from the CARES Act pandemic relief bill, the industry still laid off 16 percent of their workforce.”
More than 500 groups have also rallied around securing the elimination of fossil fuel subsidies and other giveaways to the industry in upcoming legislative packages. “There are a handful of representatives from oil-heavy districts, but there are many more moderates who don’t have a stake in the fossil fuel industry,” Friends of the Earth Program Manager Lukas Ross said. “Voting against fossil fuel subsidies should not be difficult for any member of the Democratic Party.”
President Biden has repeatedly expressed support for ending fossil fuel subsidies. It’s part of the tax reform section of his American Jobs Plan, and in his budget for Fiscal Year 2022 he proposed repealing a slew of tax benefits for the oil and gas industry, including the expensing of intangible drilling costs, the credit for oil and gas produced from marginal wells, and enhanced oil recovery credit, to name a few. But he’s been relatively quiet on the issue now that negotiations are underway, worrying some progressives and environmental groups who fear he may be going back on his promise.
In a recently leaked White House memo on climate priorities, the Biden administration commits to advancing a handful of market-based climate initiatives through the filibuster-proof package, but makes no mention of fossil fuel subsidies. Climate advocates also note that Biden’s support for extending subsidies to companies that implement carbon capture and storage still ends up giving the industries the same government assistance he claims to oppose.
“Biden should reassure progressives by screaming from the rooftops that fossil fuel subsidies must be repealed,” Ross said. “To ensure the commitments he made in the campaign trail, the commitments he made in the original outline of the American Jobs Plan. This is a long-standing position for Joe Biden; he should not run from it now.”
The Exxon revelations were shocking, in large part, because the public rarely hears the unfiltered thoughts and strategies of top corporate lobbyists. But their admissions, specifically those about targeting Democratic senators to defang the bipartisan infrastructure deal, were exactly what many already suspected.
“There was a portal to hell open in the Gulf of Mexico for a minute there,” Ross added. “You would think that Democrats would have an easier time turning their backs on Exxon. The infrastructure bill is a test of how far Democrats are willing to take opposition to the fossil fuel industry. If fossil fuel subsidies aren’t repealed, I think we’re going to have our answer.”
Representative Khanna, chair of the House Oversight Committee subcommittee on the environment, has been threatening to subpoena the executives of Exxon, Chevron, Shell, and other major companies to compel them to testify before Congress if they refuse to do so voluntarily. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, has previously called on top oil and gas executives to testify at a public hearing on climate change. The CEOs of BP America, Chevron, and ExxonMobil swiftly refused the Vermont senator’s request.
I know that many important organizations are asking you to donate today, but this year especially, The Nation needs your support.
Over the course of 2025, the Trump administration has presided over a government designed to chill activism and dissent.
The Nation experienced its efforts to destroy press freedom firsthand in September, when Vice President JD Vance attacked our magazine. Vance was following Donald Trump’s lead—waging war on the media through a series of lawsuits against publications and broadcasters, all intended to intimidate those speaking truth to power.
The Nation will never yield to these menacing currents. We have survived for 160 years and we will continue challenging new forms of intimidation, just as we refused to bow to McCarthyism seven decades ago. But in this frightening media environment, we’re relying on you to help us fund journalism that effectively challenges Trump’s crude authoritarianism.
For today only, a generous donor is matching all gifts to The Nation up to $25,000. If we hit our goal this Giving Tuesday, that’s $50,000 for journalism with a sense of urgency.
With your support, we’ll continue to publish investigations that expose the administration’s corruption, analysis that sounds the alarm on AI’s unregulated capture of the military, and profiles of the inspiring stories of people who successfully take on the ICE terror machine.
We’ll also introduce you to the new faces and ideas in this progressive moment, just like we did with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. We will always believe that a more just tomorrow is in our power today.
Please, don’t miss this chance to double your impact. Donate to The Nation today.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and publisher, The Nation
In a recent interview with The Nation, Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz declined to comment on the specifics of the Exxon sting video, but echoed the call for oil and gas executives to publicly answer for their industry’s decades-long misinformation campaign and destruction of the planet.
“We in the Senate don’t have that authority without bipartisan cooperation, so this is more likely to have to originate in the House,” he said. “But yes, I think all the major energy company executives that have been dedicated to warming the planet for the purpose of their own profitability should be required to testify under oath as soon as possible.”
Aída ChávezTwitterAída Chávez is communications director and policy adviser at Just Foreign Policy. She was previously The Nation’s D.C. correspondent and a reporter at The Intercept, More Perfect Union, and other outlets.