We Win: San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant Will Be Shut Down

We Win: San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant Will Be Shut Down

We Win: San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant Will Be Shut Down

Decades of protest by local activists has resulted in a historic victory.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket


Clouds spew from a cooling tower at PECO's nuclear generating station in LImerick, PA. (AP Photo/Geore Widman)

We win: Southern California Edison announced Friday it will shut down the troubled San Onofre nuclear power plant south of Los Angeles. Permanently.

The plant, which has been the target of anti-nuclear protests for decades, has been closed for seventeen months because of radioactivity leaking from the steam generators. But until now, Edison had defied critics and pledged to restart the plant.

Dan Hirsch of Committee to Bridge the Gap, who has been fighting San Onofre since before opened in the late 1970s, said, “An atomic dragon has been slain. Millions of people in Southern California are now safer.”

The decision to shut the plant came three days after former NRC head Gregory Jaczko said he had doubts about Edison’s recent announcement that it intended to restart the plant at 70 percent power for five months.“The approach does not instill a lot of confidence in me,” he said June 4 in San Diego. “It’s a fairly novel idea to allow a plant to operate at a reduced power level because of a safety issue.”

Leading the fight to shut down San Onofre have been locals Gary Headrick of San Clemente Green, Gene Stone of Residents Organized for a Safe Environment and Donna Gilmore of San Onofre Safety, along with Dan Hirsch of the Committee to Bridge the Gap. They’ve gotten help from Arnie Gundersen and Friends of the Earth and of course from Helen Caldicott. Activists held rallies, spoke at official meetings and petitioned the NRC and Congress. They pointed out that San Onofre has the worst safety complaint record of all US nuclear reactors according to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) safety allegation data.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x