Two Blue Dogs Defeated in Pennsylvania Primaries

Two Blue Dogs Defeated in Pennsylvania Primaries

Two Blue Dogs Defeated in Pennsylvania Primaries

Democratic congressmen who voted with Republicans on budget issues—and opposed healthcare reform—lost in primaries where populist economic messages won out.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket


Outgoing US Representative Jason Altmire walks out of the polling area after he he voted in the Pennsylvania primary election on Tuesday, April 24, 2012, in McCandless, a suburb north of Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Two conservative Democratic congressman who aligned with Republicans during last year’s budget fights and broke to the right on a host of other issues were defeated in primary contests Tuesday in Pennsylvania.

Congressmen Tim Holden and Jason Altmire, both members of the conservative “Blue Dog Coalition,” were swept out of office by Democratic primary voters who opted for candidates who were more clearly critical of corporate abuses and right-wing policies.

One thing that distinguished Holden and Altmire was their support for the Republican balanced-budget amendment in 2011—a vote that put them at odds with the vast majority of Democrats in Congress. The GOP proposal sought to make deep cuts in Medicare funding and in support for education and healthcare initiatives.

Holden was defeated by northeastern Pennsylvania trial lawyer Matt Cartwright, a proud “Roosevelt Democrat” who placed himself in Paul Wellstone’s “Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.” Cartwright ran with strong support from the League of Conservation Voters and other groups that objected to the incumbent’s following of the corporate line on environmental issues such as fracking. While Holden, the dean of the Pennsylvania Congressional delegation, cast a critical vote against the Democrat’s healthcare reform proposal, his challenger’s campaign declared: “Matt would have supported President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. He remains dissatisfied, however, that it did not go far enough to expand health care coverage for more Americans and hold insurance companies more accountable for what they charge families.”

Altmire, a favorite of Fox hosts who claimed his fellow Democrats suffered setbacks in 2010 because “we were going further to the left than we should have,” lost in a race forced by redistricting with Congressman Mark Critz.

Critz ran with the enthusiastic support of organized labor.

United Steelworkers Union President Leo Gerard campaigned at Critz’s side across the new 12th district in western Pennsylvania, which included far more of Altmire’s old turf than Critz’s.

Gerard argued that the district had been “gerrymandered in a way that would have given Jason Altmire an advantage,” and he bluntly explained that Republicans in the statehouse were protecting a friendly Democrat.

“The reason they did that is, Jason had voted 53 percent of the time with the Republicans,” said the leader of the union that remains a powerful force in western Pennsylvania.

Critz’s critical message at the close of the race was one of support for “making millionaires pay their fair share” and opposition to “the Republican balanced-budget amendment” because, the congressman said, “not only would it mean deep cuts to Medicare benefits, it would cut education and high-tech research that creates new jobs.”

The kicker: “Jason Altmire voted for the Republican balanced budget amendment.”

Cartwright, in his race against Holden, was even more of a Roosevelt Democrat.

“Matt is running for Congress to make sure big corporations and wealthy Americans pay their fair share,” declared the candidate’s ads, in which Cartwright griped, “All of a sudden it’s the corporations picking who is elected. It’s obscene.”

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x