Syria OK’s Arab League Deal

Syria OK’s Arab League Deal

 Obama wants Assad to quit, but the Arab League and Syria have agreed on a peace plan to resolve the crisis.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

UPDATE: Syria and the Arab League have annoubnced an agreement designed to end the crisis in Syria, and the deal has been endorsed by the United Nations. Now the question is: Will the Syrian opposition talk to President Assad?

With rumblings on the right about the need for NATO to turn its sanguinary attention to Syria, it’s a good sign that Syria seems to have accepted an Arab League plan to resolve the crisis peacefully. As always, however, the devil is lurking in a thicket of details.

According to published reports, the Arab League put forward a plan “calling for the Syrian government to withdraw security forces from the streets, stop violence by pro-government forces against civilians, and begin talks with the Syrian opposition in Cairo.” So far, it isn’t clear if Syria has accepted the proposal in full, put forward a counterproposal, or is just feinting. Later today, in Cairo, the league is supposed to make an official announcement.

Among the sticking points: Syria isn’t happy about negotiating with the opposition outside the country—i.e., in Cairo—because that means the more militant opposition will be included. Left to its druthers, President Assad’s government would prefer to talk to the more docile opposition, especially the Damascus-based figures who’ve already expressed a willingness to talk about reforms. Others, including forces based in Turkey—and, apparently, increasingly backed by the Turkish government—are tilting toward armed insurrection.

Yesterday, I blogged about the possibility of a NATO intervention, including calls from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and from Senator John McCain about the need for a tougher, more interventionist approach. In that piece, I cited a denial from Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO chief, who ruled out NATO intervention a la Libya. But now Rasmussen is qualifying his statement a little, opening a trap door by saying that what happened in Libya ought to be a warning to Assad: “I strongly condemn the crackdown on the civilian population in Syria. What has happened in Libya sends a clear signal. You cannot neglect the will of the people.”

Inside Syria itself, there’s still fighting going on, and the crackdown continues.

But Russia has commented favorably on the Arab League plan, and China seems to back it, too. Xinhua, the Chinese news agency, reports on some possible Syrian modifications to the Arab League plan:

It has been reported that Damascus has made some amendments to the plan and incorporated its own considerations into it, including mainly the need of a complete halt of media campaign launched against Syria coupled with strict measures to stop funding of alleged terrorists and weapon smuggling across its borders.

Syria has also agreed to conduct dialogue with the opposition and make quick and radical reforms. However, the contentious issue is still the location to hold the proposed dialogue, as Damascus is showing unwavering determination to convene it in Damascus in presence of international observers from China, Russia, Brazil and India.

Stay tuned.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x