Sestak vs. Specter

Sestak vs. Specter

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The debate over issues like President Obama’s stimulus, healthcarereform and climate change have revealed fault lines in the country, butalso within the Democratic party. In the stimulus fight, longtimeRepublican Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter backed President Obama. InApril, Senator Specter switched parties, edging Democrats closer to aso-called “super-majority” in the Senate and roiling Washington. But forprogressives, is Senator Specter an ally, or someone who switchedparties out of political convenience?

Tomorrow, Senator Specter will face political bloggers, Pennsylvaniavoters and his primary opponent, Democratic Congressman Joe Sestak, in aforum held as part of the “Netroots Nation” yearlyconference of progressive bloggers and online activists. TheSpecter-Sestak debatewith be co-moderated by The Nation‘s own Net MovementCorrespondent Ari Melber and Pennsylvania blogger Susie Madrak, and livestreaming here atTheNation.com at 11 AM Friday, EST.

In 2007, Netroots Nation (then “Yearly Kos”) was the site of one ofthe most thoughtful, informed and vigorous debates of the Presidentialprimary cycle. By bringing together Sestak and Specter — who areengagedin what may be the defining race of the 2010 Democratic primary season–Netroots Nation is keeping online citizen engagement at the forefront ofour modern political process, and taking head-on the future of theDemocratic party.

Madrak and Melber have been collectingquestions online for weeks, andare expected to address both National and Pennsylvania-specificconcerns. In a unique online feedback forum, Melber and Madrak areasking people to vote questions up or down, as they consider what to askthe candidates. Here are some of the leaders:

What is your position on climate change legislation?

Will you vote for a healthcare reform bill with a strong publicoption?

Will you vote for “cloture,” a process that allows up or down votingand only 51 votes instead of 60 for passage on key bills like healthcareand climate change?

The question of cloture is an implicit challenge to Sestak and Specterto put a stake in the ground about their allegiance to progressivecauses: Does bipartisanship and Senate process trump passage ofprogressive legislation? It is an important question, and one thatSpecter will quickly face when healthcare reform comes up for a votenext month.

The forum should be lively, and we will have a recap afterwards. Butwe do hope you’ll join us here at TheNation.com tomorrow at 11 AM andwatch it happen live.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x