Senate Clinches Healthcare Deal with Abortion Compromise

Senate Clinches Healthcare Deal with Abortion Compromise

Senate Clinches Healthcare Deal with Abortion Compromise

Democratic senators get to 60 votes on healthcare, striking a deal on abortion that is not quite as odious as the House’s restriction.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

 Amid a blizzard, Democratic senators struck a deal on healthcare, enabling Majority Leader Harry Reid to count 60 votes in favor of his bill. Talking Points Memo has a good run-down of the deal struck on abortion, which is not quite as odious as the House’s restriction (which banned any plan supported in any part by federal subsidy from including abortion coverage) but still involves what sounds like a very cumbersome work-around for anyone who wants coverage. In this compromise, anyone buying insurance with federal subsidy who wants a plan that covers abortion will have to send two separate checks to the insurance company, one earmarked for the portion of the private dollars that will go to cover abortion care. As TPM puts it, "If the plan costs $1000 a month, and the insurer plans to sequester $50 to put into a pool that covers abortions, you have to make one payment of $950 and a separate payment of $50." Sen. Ben Nelson, who had been the most intractable hold-out, said he’d support this version, as did pro-choice Sens. Barbara Boxer and Patty Murray.

 

Whether this compromise will be palatable to Rep. Bart Stupak and others in the House who supported the more stringent restriction, we’ll soon find out. As I’ve written before, pro-choice members of the House have said that they wouldn’t have voted for the House healthcare bill had they not been assured that the Stupak amendment would be taken out in conference committee. But, then again, the pro-choice movement was also assured that the Capps compromise was what would hold in the House. Assurances, we’ve learned, aren’t the same as a vote.

 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x