Romney Narrowly Wins First GOP Contest, but Obama Has Advantage in Iowa

Romney Narrowly Wins First GOP Contest, but Obama Has Advantage in Iowa

Romney Narrowly Wins First GOP Contest, but Obama Has Advantage in Iowa

Despite all the attention on the Republicans, President Obama was the real winner in Iowa last night.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In the end, Mitt Romney won Iowa by a staggeringly close eight votes and will likely be the GOP presidential nominee. But we already knew that heading into last night. How Romney gets the nomination, and what shape he’s in when he faces off against Barack Obama, will be the real story of the GOP race. Based on his performance last night, Romney’s showing in Iowa doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in his campaign.

Romney has outspent Rick Santorum by a margin of 17-1 so far (not including upwards of $3 million in pro-Romney Super PAC advertising in Iowa) and still only won by eight votes. He won fewer counties last night (17) than he did in 2008 (24), got a slightly lower percentage of the vote (24.55 percent last night vs. 25.19 percent in ’08) and actually lost six votes overall (30,015 last night vs. 30,021 in ’08). Sure, Romney hardly campaigned in the state this cycle, but you’d expect a rich front-runner in a weak field with four years of additional exposure to at least improve upon his showing.

In contrast, 25,000 Iowa Democrats turned out to hear President Obama give a brief address to supporters at last night’s essentially meaningless Democratic caucus. Despite the rapid desire among Republicans to defeat the president, Democratic turnout in 2008 (239,000 voters) was nearly double the GOP turnout last night (122,000). At last night’s caucus, the Obama campaign signed up 7,500 volunteers and will leave behind eight campaign offices in the state as GOP candidates criss-cross the country.

That’s not to suggest that Obama’s re-election efforts will be smooth sailing. But in this crucial swing state, the president has to like his chances.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x