Republicans Are Digging in Their Heels Over President Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee. Demand That They Do Their Job

Republicans Are Digging in Their Heels Over President Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee. Demand That They Do Their Job

Republicans Are Digging in Their Heels Over President Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee. Demand That They Do Their Job

The American people have already voted on who should appoint our next justice.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

EDITOR’S NOTE: On March 16, President Obama announced that Merrick Garland would be his Supreme Court nominee. Now that the president has done his job, it's time for members of the Senate to do theirs.

What’s going on?

President Obama has reached out to Senate Republican leadership and insisted that he will move forward with his clear constitutional duty to pick a new Supreme Court justice in the wake of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But Republican senators continue to dig in their heels, insisting that the American people would be better served if they delayed even holding a hearing on a nominee until after a new president is sworn in. And as the Supreme Court reconvenes and considers the biggest abortion case in a decade, we’re reminded of how deeply influential the court’s decisions are in the lives of Americans.

The composition of the Supreme Court has an enormous impact, and the American people absolutely deserve an election that gives them a say in who will be appointed. But as Nan Aron and Kyle C. Barry wrote in The Nation, that election already happened, “in 2012, when the American people elected President Obama to another four-year term that still has 11 months remaining.”

What can I do?

Join The Nation and Alliance for Justice in demanding that Republican senators do their job and give President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court a fair hearing.

Read more

Since the death of Justice Scalia, The Nation has kept a close watch on Republicans’ obstructionism. Nan Aron and Kyle C. Barry broke down what will happen to cases currently being considered and called on Republican senators to fulfill their constitutional duty. William Greider reported on what the fight over the Supreme Court could mean for the 2016 election. And John Nichols looked at the hypocrisy of Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x