Putin at the UN

Putin at the UN

Russian leader asks, will the US rethink its destructive, “revolutionary” role in the world?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new Cold War. This installment focuses on the speeches given at the UN by Presidents Obama and Putin on September 28 and on their private meeting. Cohen points out that the two speeches spelled out with considerable candor and clarity the very different and conflicting international thinking in Washington and Moscow. US policies in various parts of the world, from the Middle East to Ukraine, have been driven by a regime-change agenda in the name of democracy and a better life for those regions, a perspective reiterated in Obama’s speech. Putin replied that those US policies have resulted only in greater tyranny and more human misery, as evidenced by the march of ISIS through Iraq and Syria. Cohen asks, can Washington rethink its policies and can Russia ever be right?

If so, this may be the moment for such rethinking in Washington. Obama’s decision to meet privately with Putin was tacit admission that two of the White House’s major foreign policies have failed: the attempt to stop ISIS through a US-led military campaign; and the even longer policy of “isolating Putin’s Russia.” Various related issues are also discussed in this installment, including Putin’s proposal for a US-Russian “coalition” against ISIS akin to the US-Soviet alliance against Hitler’s Germany in World War II.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x