Olympics Boycott? Will US Leaders Play the Game?

Olympics Boycott? Will US Leaders Play the Game?

Olympics Boycott? Will US Leaders Play the Game?

The Olympics are appropriately referred to as “games.”

What is happening in Tibet is no game.

The Chinese government, which is preparing to host the Olympics this summer in Beijing, is brutally attacking the people of Tibet in order to put down a legitimate struggle for basic human rights.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Olympics are appropriately referred to as “games.”

What is happening in Tibet is no game.

The Chinese government, which is preparing to host the Olympics this summer in Beijing, is brutally attacking the people of Tibet in order to put down a legitimate struggle for basic human rights.

The pressure that the world can place on China to stop the killing and what can only be described as cultural genocide begins with a message that the games of the Olympics are not as important as the real-life struggles of the Tibetan people.

That message is beginning to be sent.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has become the first world leader to refuse to attend the Olympics in Beijing.

Hans-Gert Pöttering, a member of Merkel’s Christian Democratic party who chairs the European parliament, has stoked discussion of a broader Olympic boycott, saying, “I cannot imagine German politicians attending the opening or closing ceremonies [if the Tibetan crackdown continues].”

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has indicated that he may join Merkel in saying to the Chinese — who see the Olympics as a marketing tool of immense importance to their country’s economic and political emergence — that what is being done to Tibet stains the name not just of China but of any country that would play with it the public relations game that the Olympics have become.

Other leaders are opting out of the pageant in Beijing, as well.

Czech President Vaclav Havel, who had previously arranged to be at the Olympics, has announced that he will not attend.

Already, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has announced his decision to boycott the games, saying that, “The presence of politicians at the inauguration of the Olympics seems inappropriate. I do not intend to take part.”

What of American “leaders”? President Bush has shown little serious concern for the Tibet, and much sympathy with the Chinese. That is to be expected of a man for whom morality has always taken a backseat to political gamesmanship.

But what of those who would be president?

What say John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama?

To be sure, that trio is likely be busy this summer. But would they, if they sat in the White House, play China’s Olympic game? Or would they recognize, as Merkel and others have, that there are more serious issues in play this year?

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x