Olmert:: The End of Greater Israel

Olmert:: The End of Greater Israel

Okay, we all wish outgoing Israeli Prime Minister Olmert had said this stuff during his time in office. Still, it’s stunning. Here are the direct quotes, via the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharanot and Y-Net:

“The notion of a Greater Israel no longer exists, and anyone who still believes in it is deluding themselves.

“Forty years after the Six Day War ended, we keep finding excuses not to act. This isn’t doing Israel any good. The international community in starting to view Israel as a future binational state. We can prove that we have been more creative than the other side through the years, and that they have been more obstinate, but as usual, we will win the debate by losing sight of what’s really important.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Okay, we all wish outgoing Israeli Prime Minister Olmert had said this stuff during his time in office. Still, it’s stunning. Here are the direct quotes, via the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharanot and Y-Net:

“The notion of a Greater Israel no longer exists, and anyone who still believes in it is deluding themselves.

“Forty years after the Six Day War ended, we keep finding excuses not to act. This isn’t doing Israel any good. The international community in starting to view Israel as a future binational state. We can prove that we have been more creative than the other side through the years, and that they have been more obstinate, but as usual, we will win the debate by losing sight of what’s really important.

“We can always find very good reasons for not doing things now, and for why we would be better off postponing everything to a later date. We refuse to face reality. Time is not on Israel’s side, not because our cause isn’t just, but because time has its own repercussions.

“I admit – this hasn’t always been my position. In the past I’ve said – and I said it to (Labor Chairman Ehud) Barak at the time – that what he agreed to in Camp David was wrong.

“I used to believe that everything from the Jordan River bank to the Mediterranean Sea was ours. After all, dig anywhere and you’ll find Jewish history. But eventually, after great internal conflict, I’ve realized we have to share this land with the people who dwell here – that is if we don’t want to be a binational state.

“No other nation is as strong and no other nation in the Middle East can rival us. The strategic threats we face have nothing to do with where we draw our borders.

“We can argue about every single detail, but when we finally hash out an agreement we may find we no longer have the international community’s backing, or a partner for that matter. We’ll be left with nothing but the feeling that once again, as for the past 40 years, we were right.

“I’m not kidding myself. I know the change I’m talking about won’t rid us of all the threats. We’ll still be facing Palestinians threats across the security fence, since they have no real security establishment, but we can deal with all of that and we would be better off dealing with it than cementing the notion of a binational state in the international community’s mind.

“The public knows we can’t put it off. Voluntary evacuation is a part of that realization. A day will come, probably sooner than some are willing to admit, that all of us will be willing to embrace the same solutions that some of us are rejecting right now.

“Israel has always known how to make wise decisions and how to protect itself. We have to ask ourselves is losing a hill here or there, is worth forfeiting the chance to achieve something. This is why I say that this is the time to discuss the evacuation-compensation (bill). We have to keep pushing it, and eventually bring it before the government.

“This is the time to push for peace with both the Palestinians and the Syrians. If we know how to do that, other Arab countries, which are yet to acknowledge us in public, will soon follow.”

It’s caused a storm of controvery in Israel, especially since Olmert also called for giving East Jerusalem to the Palestinians.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x