Noted.

Noted.

After insulting veterans, Homeland Security gets a do-over on a report on right-wing extremism; mass transit comes to small towns.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

TERRORISM AND TEA PARTIES:

The oddly controversial

Rightwing Extremism

report, issued by the

Department of Homeland Security

on April 7, was officially withdrawn by Secretary

Janet Napolitano

in mid-May. The nine-page report was a routine threat assessment issued to law enforcement and counterterrorism officials that warned of the potential for a rise in homegrown terrorists. It concluded that the combination of an economic downturn and the election of the first African-American president could cultivate a right-wing “resurgence in radicalization and recruitment,” including among disgruntled veterans.

Conservatives immediately claimed that the threat assessment was a politically motivated attack on Republicans. Texas Representative

John Carter

suggested that the report was evidence of “a level of contempt for a healthy democracy” and demanded Napolitano’s ouster, even though the assessment was initiated during the Bush administration. Columnist

Michelle Malkin

wrote that “the piece of crap report…is a sweeping indictment of conservatives”–this despite the fact that the assessment never once used the word “conservative.”

When it was revealed that DHS had released a similar report on left-wing extremists three months earlier, claims of bias gave way to support for supposedly maligned veterans. The right-wing threat assessment drew unconvincing, and some said offensive, parallels between the present and the mid-’90s, when

Timothy McVeigh

, a veteran of the Gulf War, staged the second deadliest terror attack in US history. While Napolitano subsequently conceded that the report “should not have gone out,” the overblown Republican reaction to it is nonetheless significant.

Conservatives’ response–which began with outrage over a DHS report focused on “threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups” and concluded with calls for a Congressional inquiry and a lawsuit being filed by the

Thomas More Law Center

at the behest of shock jock

Michael Savage

–suggests that either Republicans did not read the threat assessment closely or that there really is something to all their incendiary, inchoate “Tea Party” ranting. We will soon find out: Napolitano has promised that the report is in the process of being “replaced or redone in a much more useful and much more precise fashion.”   CORBIN HIAR

ESSAY ASSAY:

The Nation is accepting submissions for our 2009 Student Writing Contest, sponsored by the

BIL Charitable Trust

. We’re looking for original, thoughtful student voices to answer this question: how has the recession affected you, your family or someone you know? All high school and college students are eligible. Essays should not exceed 800 words. Winners will receive $1,000, and their essays will be published in The Nation. Entries accepted through May 31. Submit to [email protected]. Info at TheNation.com/student.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x