Not Enough on Cuba Embargo

Not Enough on Cuba Embargo

The president makes some progress, but not enough, on ending the anachronism called the US embargo against Cuba.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Next year, the US embargo against Cuba will be a half-century old, a mold-encrusted relic in the cold war museum, yet there it is—and it doesn’t look like the Obama administration is planning to end it anytime soon. On January 14, the White House announced a series of half-measures that weaken American efforts to isolate Havana, welcome steps all: academic, cultural, and religious groups can now freely travel to Cuba; American citizens are free to send money to non-relatives in the island nation, up to $500 every three months; and any US airport may now allow licensed charter aircraft to fly roundtrip. It’s a follow-up to measures that President Obama announced in April 2009 lifting restrictions on travel and cash remittances by family members of Cuban residents.

Yet the president’s actions hardly qualify as a profile in courage. He held off making the announcement last fall, when hawks in Congress, including Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) and Albio Sires (D-NJ) warned that easing anti-Cuba measures could hurt Democrats’ re-election chances, and when the decision was made it was released late on Friday evening, while Republicans were out of town on a retreat. Yet more than two-thirds of voters support easing travel restrictions on Cuba, and 75 percent (86 percent of Democrats) back the idea of a meeting between US and Cuban leaders. Conservative groups, from the US Chamber of Commerce to the US Conference of Catholic Bishops want to end the isolation of Cuba. And in the end, what Obama did only gets American policy back roughly to where it was during the Clinton administration, before George W. Bush tightened the screws.

The usual suspects made noises: Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the chairwoman of the House Foreign Relations Committee, condemned Obama’s decision, and Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) called it a "gift to the Castro brothers." It remains to be seen if Obama will quietly ignore their ilk and move forward to end the embargo once and for all. The Cuban foreign ministry, while calling Obama’s actions "positive," concluded: "They have a very limited reach and do not change US policy against Cuba." It’s past time for change we do believe in.

Like this Blog Post? Read it on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x