How Many Democratic Delegates? No One Knows

How Many Democratic Delegates? No One Knows

How Many Democratic Delegates? No One Knows

In case you thought the race for the Democratic presidential nomination was a little too easy to follow, consider this notion: We do not currently know exactly how many delegate votes will be required to win the party nod when it convenes this summer in Denver.

How can that be? Because the number of superdelegates — party leaders and elected officials who are guaranteed places at the convention — keeps changing.

At the start of last week, the number was 794.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In case you thought the race for the Democratic presidential nomination was a little too easy to follow, consider this notion: We do not currently know exactly how many delegate votes will be required to win the party nod when it convenes this summer in Denver.

How can that be? Because the number of superdelegates — party leaders and elected officials who are guaranteed places at the convention — keeps changing.

At the start of last week, the number was 794.

Then Maryland Congressman Al Wynn, who lost a February primary to progressive Donna Edwards, announced that he was resigning from the House to become a lobbyist.

With his exit from Congress – which is expected to come early in June — Wynn will cease to be a superdelegate. But, because Edwards has not been elected to the seat, she is not a superdelegate.

So the superdelegate total drops to 793.

That means that the overall number of delegates is now 4,046. Thus, if all delegates vote and if they all vote for one of the two remaining candidates — Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton — it will require 2,023.5 votes to be nominated.

But that figure will change.

If a special election is called and held in Maryland’s 4th Congressional District before the end of August, Edwards might become a superdelegate. (Like Wynn, she’s an Obama backer.)

Special elections for House seats in California, Mississippi and two Louisiana districts could conceivably add as many as four new Democratic members of Congress, upping the superdelegate total by four. (The all-but-certain election by San Francisco Bay area voters of Jackie Speier to replace the late Tom Lantos will move the total up by at least one.)

Then there is the nasty question of whether and how to seat 23 superdelegates from Michigan and 27 from Florida — not to mention all the other potential delegates from those currently disenfranchised states. Anyone who expects to see the doors to the convention hall barred to senior members of Congress such as Judiciary Committee chair John Conyers, D-Michigan, Energy and Commerce committee chair John Dingell, D-Michigan, or Florida Senator Bill Nelson is just being ridiculous at this point. But how they get in, and how they vote, remains to be seen.

Bottom line: We do not know how many delegates it will take to win the Democratic presidential nomination because we do not know how many delegates — super or otherwise — will be seated in Denver.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x