House Backs Auto Bailout, But Will Senate GOP Kill It?

House Backs Auto Bailout, But Will Senate GOP Kill It?

House Backs Auto Bailout, But Will Senate GOP Kill It?

After months of dithering as factories closed and unemployment figures rose, on house of Congress has finally taken a step to shore up the real economy of the United States. By a vote of 237 to 170, the House of Representatives on Wednesday night endorsed a $14 billion bailout plan for domestic automakers that have been brought to the brink of bankruptcy by their own shortsightedness and a global economic meltdown.

The measure enacted by the House should keep General Motors, Ford and Chrysler solvent — and an estimated three million workers who faced the threat of jobs losses in their positions — through March, when it is expected that the administration of President-elect Barack Obama and a new Congress will present a long-term plan for restoring the fiscal health and competitiveness of an industry that remains the backbone of American manufacturing.

Even President Bush acknowledges that this disappointing but essential legislation is needed now to avoid massive and potentially irreversible layoffs and plant closings. Yet, only 32 Republicans joined 205 Democrats in backing the Auto Industry Financing and Restructuring Act. One hundred and fifty Republicans and 20 Democrats voted “no.”

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

After months of dithering as factories closed and unemployment figures rose, on house of Congress has finally taken a step to shore up the real economy of the United States. By a vote of 237 to 170, the House of Representatives on Wednesday night endorsed a $14 billion bailout plan for domestic automakers that have been brought to the brink of bankruptcy by their own shortsightedness and a global economic meltdown.

The measure enacted by the House should keep General Motors, Ford and Chrysler solvent — and an estimated three million workers who faced the threat of jobs losses in their positions — through March, when it is expected that the administration of President-elect Barack Obama and a new Congress will present a long-term plan for restoring the fiscal health and competitiveness of an industry that remains the backbone of American manufacturing.

Even President Bush acknowledges that this disappointing but essential legislation is needed now to avoid massive and potentially irreversible layoffs and plant closings. Yet, only 32 Republicans joined 205 Democrats in backing the Auto Industry Financing and Restructuring Act. One hundred and fifty Republicans and 20 Democrats voted “no.”

Most of the Republican “yes” votes for the measure came from representatives of states that still have GM, Ford and Chrysler plants — Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, Missouri and New York.

Most of the Democratic “no” votes came from southern and western “Blue Dog” Democrats, many of whom represent states where foreign automakers have set up non-union plants.

Fiscal conservatism was not an issue, as many of the Republicans who voted against the auto bailout had voted for Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s dramatically larger bank bailout legislation in September. Similarly, some of the most ardent Democratic backers of the auto bailout were outspoken critics of Paulson’s plans for Wall Street.

While the auto bailout won in the House, the high level of Republican opposition does not bode well for advocates of the measure as it heads to the Senate, where Republicans say they will try to block it — and where the chamber’s filibuster rules could allow a minority of members to prevent a vote on the bailout.

“I don’t think the votes are there on our side of the aisle,” says Ohio Senator George Voinovich, one of few Republican supporters of moves to preserve domestic auto companies and the family-supporting jobs they provide in communities across the industrial heartland.

If the Senate kills the bill, the headline may yet be: “GOP to American Auto Workers and Car Dealers: Drop Dead.”

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x