Government Funding Cannot Save Journalism

Government Funding Cannot Save Journalism

Government Funding Cannot Save Journalism

David Carr calls the idea that good watchdog media can be funded by the government "frankly preposterous."

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In a conversation with The Nation‘s John Nichols and others about new models for journalism, New York Times media critic David Carr argues vigorously that government funding and subsidies can’t save journalism. "I don’t view government as either dependable, as efficacious and as capable." Carr supports this statement by explaining that today’s public models of journalism, like PBS and NPR, receive only about 20 percent of their budget from government funding. Additionally, other areas funded by the government, such as public schools, hospitals and infrastructure, lack money. Carr advocates for a hybrid model which would combine citizen funding with support from the private and charitable sectors.

He also argues that Nichols and McChesney, in their book The Death and Life of American Journalism, underestimate journalism’s "green shoots," new models that, although in their infancy, could provide real solutions to the current failings of American journalism. "You can make the argument…it’s not enough, but that’s not how change occurs," Carr argues. "You don’t flip the switch…and walk into a bright future."

–Morgan Ashenfelter

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x