In Fact…

In Fact…

THE FALL OF LEWIS LAPHAM

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

THE FALL OF LEWIS LAPHAM

Lewis Lapham, whose broadside against contemporary conservatism is reviewed on page 36, has been editor of Harper’s since 1983 (in addition to an earlier stint). He has become as strongly identified with the magazine as Mencken was with The American Mercury or Ross with The New Yorker. That lonely eminence makes him something of a target for critical potshots from his lessers. Thus, when libertarian Reason‘s blog pointed out that Lapham had written about the GOP convention in an issue of the magazine that appeared before the event took place, a wave of much tsk-tsking coursed through the media and Lapham rightly apologized to his readers. Jack Shafer of Slate was even inspired to expatiate at length on how it just goes to show how predictably liberal Harper’s is these days. Frankly, dears, we don’t give a damn. Lapham’s Harper’s article merely asserts that the “speeches in Madison Square Garden affirmed the great truths” of conservatism, i.e., “government the problem not the solution; the social contract a dead letter; the free market the answer to every maiden’s prayer.” Seems to us a fair summary of the Republican rhetorical gusts of August.

TRUE WEALTH

Forbes magazine’s annual celebration of the 400 richest Americans has just appeared. As a kind of companion document we recommend another report, I Didn’t Do It Alone: Society’s Contribution to Individual Wealth and Success. The authors are Chuck Collins, Scott Klinger and Mike Lapham, of Responsible Wealth, a group of affluent Americans who advocate reducing economic inequality and champion the estate tax and taxing the rich. Their report features stories by wealthy people crediting their success to social advantages, luck and privilege. They are contrasted with self-proclaimed self-made types who deny a debt to society (www.faireconomy.org).

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x