Documenting the Obama Administration’s ‘Gitmo in the Heartland’

Documenting the Obama Administration’s ‘Gitmo in the Heartland’

Documenting the Obama Administration’s ‘Gitmo in the Heartland’

The Obama Administration has continued to operate Bush’s legally-dubious detention centers for terrorism prisoners, but the opaque practices at these secret prisons deserve to be rigorously reconsidered.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In 2006, the Bush Administration opened Communications Management Unit prisons in Marion, Illinois and Terre Haute, Indiana. These unusual units, with their extreme practices and secrecy, make up a kind of "Gitmo in the heartland," as The Nation‘s Alia Malek reports in a recent issue of the magazine. Originally created to isolate inmates suspected of having ties to terrorism, the units have come under scrutiny for the make-up of the detainee population: the majority of the inmates are Arab, and prison officials have started importing prisoners from the general prison population in an effort to cover up the skewed demographics.

On WNYC’s Leonard Lopate Show, Malek recounts how “an Iraqi-American physician, who had been sent to jail for violating Iraqi sanctions because he was sending medicine to Iraq,” was able to get a letter out confirming that most inmates are “Arab.” Another prisoner, Daniel, was a “low security” risk who was detained for his involvement in environmental terrorism. He had “exemplary” status in a prison in Minnesota but was suddenly sent to a restrictive unit in Marion with little explanation for the move. Malek says that non-Arab, non-Muslim inmates like Daniel are being sent to the CMUs as “balancers” who add a veneer of legitimacy to these legally-dubious prisons.

The Obama Administration has continued to operate the Bush-era CMUs, Malek says, but the opaque practices at these secret prisons deserve to be rigorously reconsidered.

—Kevin Gosztola

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x