Did Chris Christie Use Sandy Relief Money for Political Gain?

Did Chris Christie Use Sandy Relief Money for Political Gain?

Did Chris Christie Use Sandy Relief Money for Political Gain?

Less than a week after the “Bridgegate” scandal exploded, federal officials are now probing Chris Christie’s use of funds allocated for Sandy relief.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

As Chris Christie continues to face questions over the “Bridgegate” scandal, federal officials are probing the New Jersey Governor’s use of Superstorm Sandy relief funds, CNN reports.

Specifically, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development is looking into $4.7 million spent by the state on a tourism video featuring Christie and his family during a gubernatorial election year. Last August, the Asbury Park Press revealed a runner-up bid to produce the campaign, not starring Christie, would have cost $2.2 million less. The public relations firm hired by the state of New Jersey to make the ads, MWW, has ties to lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

The campaign, titled “Stronger Than the Storm,” was part of a $25 million state tourism package allocated by Congress’ as part of Sandy relief. Last August, Representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ) raised concerns in a letter to HUD Inspector General David A. Montoya, questioning “whether Governor Christie took advantage of the federal funds for his personal political gain.”

HUD’s investigation is the second big hit to Christie’s administration in less than a week. The governor fired two high-level staffers last Thursday after the release of hundreds of e-mails and text messages implicated them in the politically-motivated closure of a George Washington Bridge lane last September.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x