Dangerous Experiment for Deficit Hawks

Dangerous Experiment for Deficit Hawks

Dangerous Experiment for Deficit Hawks

David Leonhardt, writing in the New York Times, quotes source after source saying, "The world’s rich countries are now conducting a dangerous experiment."

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Top economics writers are sending some scary signals this week. Just as June unemployment numbers are due, Paul Krugman’s declaring that we could be headed for a third Depression, and David Leonhardt, also writing in the New York Times, quotes source after source saying, “The world’s rich countries are now conducting a dangerous experiment.”

The dangerous experiment, both writers agree, is the idea of belt-tightening when more spending is needed, of letting stimulus lapse when most people are still struggling for jobs. During the Great Depression, when business started to improve, Roosevelt vowed to balance the budget—and sent the country back into decline. The only thing that yanked the economy into a different direction was the buildup to war and war itself.

We’ve got better ideas than that, now, right? Maybe not. A year ago, former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers told the BBC at Davos that ’90s-style growth simply isn’t coming back. Yet, shunning a government jobs-creation scheme, the president’s still hoping against hope for private industry created jobs. No reason to believe the private sector will do anything different than what its done these last two years. Productivity’s up with slashed wages and workers. The private sector’s doing fine. And now the deficit hawks are circling.

So what’s the plan, Uncle Sam? In many places, the military’s the only job offer out there. Democrats in Congress just cut $13B from schools to fund $33B on Afghan escalation. Maybe that’s the plan.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x