Comments of the Week: October 21, 2011

Comments of the Week: October 21, 2011

Comments of the Week: October 21, 2011

Each week we post a weekly run-down of the best of our reader comments with the hopes of highlighting some of your most valuable insights and encouraging more people to join the fray.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Over the last few months, thenation.com has made an effort to foster a robust and thoughtful comments section befitting the mighty intelligence of our readership. We’re pleased to report that the shoe ads are gone, the name-calling is at a minimum and astute and witty commentary is on the rise. Here are our favorite comments from the last week. Let us know what you think — in the comments!

jsens: Yad061 points out a problem. How does one powerfully confront the financial system? Lunch counter sit-ins were directly confrontational; airborne troops challenging a southern governor in a schoolhouse doorway were too. But the financial industry exists on paper and in computer drives. In a sort of "cloud," if you will. We still need it. We still use it. Who is to be punished? If you can identify objects of scorn, how do you punish someone for something they did that was legal at the time, and may still be? How, in short, does one be civilly disobedient to a bank or finance company

In Response to George Goehl’s Rediscovering Civil Disobedience. October 17, 2011.

sheila62: The anger that the American people feel about bailing out Wall Street while those very crooks go free and got richer and will continue to get richer is being expressed by Occupy Wall Street. I read that it has a 54% favorable rating. People have the right to protest against these gross injustices. Obama made a big, big mistake when he sided with banksters rather than the American people. Dr. King used non-violent civil disobedience, but he was not the first. Susan B. Anthony voted and was arrested. She was tried, found guilty and never paid the fine. Alice Paul, founder of the National Woman’s Party used non-violent civil disobedience by having women picket the White House when Woodrow Wilson was president. The women did not engage in violence. However, the women were arrested and violence was used against them. I will not let my gender be thrown under the bus. Dr. King was a great man, but so were women such as Anthony, Lucy Stone, Lucretia Mott, Carrie Chapman Catt, Alice Paul, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Frances Willard, Anna Shaw and so on. Alice Paul is most credited with establishing the non-violent civil disobedience that would later be used by Dr. King and the Vietnam protesters.

In Response to George Goehl’s Rediscovering Civil Disobedience. October 17, 2011.

JamesNPA: This article points toward an emerging civil disobedience movement that is starting in parks and bank lobbies, but I see it moving to preventing wrongful foreclosures and evictions. Bodies will be on the line like the lunch counters in the civil rights movement, and this is about nothing less than Dr. King’s continuing work to save the soul of America. In Response to George Goehl’s Rediscovering Civil Disobedience. October 17, 2011.

chil43: Republicans have been making a push for voter suppression all across the nation so I wouldn’t be surprised if this bill is also an extension of the GOP’s overall national strategy to hamstring the Democratic parties success in the upcoming 2012 election, especially considering that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing minority voting block in the US today and they tend to vote democratic.
In Response to Ilyse Hogue’s Alabama’s HB56 and the Dark Side of Fake Economic Fixes. October 17, 2011.

Realword: Why is it people give a pass to the 300 filibusters the Republicans knifed the president with, and the now totally obstructing Republican majority house, and blame the President because he can’t get a jobs bill passed? That is like blaming an 80-year-old woman for not crossing the street, when five thugs with ball bats won’t let her. Come on. Call a spade, a spade.
In Response to Jamelle Bouie’s Obama’s Troubles in Virginia. October 18, 2011.

Bnerin: Is the time arising, as in 1968 when Senator Eugene McCarthy ran in the New Hampshire primary against LBJ and won 42% of the votes to LBJ’s 49% – enough to make LBJ say he would not run for reelection, for a true blue friend of the common citizen run against Obama?
In Response to Jamelle Bouie’s Obama’s Troubles in Virginia. October 18, 2011.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x