The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

In their assault on public sector workers, Republicans continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But how did the pensions become unfunded in the first place?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As Republicans escalate their assault on the benefits and livelihoods of public sector workers, they continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But how did these pensions become “unfunded” in the first place? Christopher Hayes and Dean Baker explain.

As Republicans escalate their assault on the benefits and livelihoods of public sector workers, they continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But in what way exactly are these pensions “unfunded,” and why has the mainstream media done such a poor job explaining how they came to be unfunded? Are all state pension programs unfunded? Whose idea was it to make them unfunded, Republicans, Democrats or state politicians generally? And finally, are there any state pension programs, unfunded or otherwise, that are not facing a fiscal crisis? In this week’s episode of The Breakdown, DC Editor Christopher Hayes and economist Dean Baker discuss how public pension funds function and whether or not they’re really a main factor in state budget shortfalls.

Further Reading:

Dean Baker explaining Public Pensions 101.
Dean Baker on the origins and severity of the public pension crisis [PDF].
David Cay Johnston talks about why reporting in Wisconsin on public pensions has been so bad.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x