The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

The Breakdown: Why Are Public Pensions ‘Unfunded’?

In their assault on public sector workers, Republicans continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But how did the pensions become unfunded in the first place?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As Republicans escalate their assault on the benefits and livelihoods of public sector workers, they continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But how did these pensions become “unfunded” in the first place? Christopher Hayes and Dean Baker explain.

As Republicans escalate their assault on the benefits and livelihoods of public sector workers, they continue to point to so-called “unfunded” pension programs as a symbol of broken government. But in what way exactly are these pensions “unfunded,” and why has the mainstream media done such a poor job explaining how they came to be unfunded? Are all state pension programs unfunded? Whose idea was it to make them unfunded, Republicans, Democrats or state politicians generally? And finally, are there any state pension programs, unfunded or otherwise, that are not facing a fiscal crisis? In this week’s episode of The Breakdown, DC Editor Christopher Hayes and economist Dean Baker discuss how public pension funds function and whether or not they’re really a main factor in state budget shortfalls.

Further Reading:

Dean Baker explaining Public Pensions 101.
Dean Baker on the origins and severity of the public pension crisis [PDF].
David Cay Johnston talks about why reporting in Wisconsin on public pensions has been so bad.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x