The Breakdown: How Does US Campaign Finance Stack Up Against the Rest of the World?

The Breakdown: How Does US Campaign Finance Stack Up Against the Rest of the World?

The Breakdown: How Does US Campaign Finance Stack Up Against the Rest of the World?

Are other countries as vulnerable to the effects of money and private interests in politics as we are in the United States?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Are other countries as vulnerable to the effects of money and private interests in politics as we are in the United States?

A steady stream of political scientists who study campaign finance have argued that political outcomes are primarily determined by voters, who place a hefty check on the potentially harmful effects of money and private interests in politics.  But if asked, most ordinary Americans say that private interests that invest enormous sums of money in candidates and elections profoundly alter political outcomes, often to the detriment of the public interest.  Is the US the only country with a political finance system where, as the saying goes, “if you pay the piper, you can call the tune?”  In this week’s edition of The Breakdown, political scientist Thomas Ferguson joins DC Editor Christopher Hayes to discuss how the US campaign finance system compares to the rest of the world’s.

Further Reading
Nation blogger Jamelle Bouie on anonymous campaign contributions.
GRITtv segment with Christopher Hayes and Erica Payne on cash-hoarding during last midterm elections.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x