Toggle Menu

Catholic Activists Stand Trial for Protesting Nuclear Weapons

The members of the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 face decades in prison for their nonviolent direct action at a naval base last year.

Sam Husseini

October 21, 2019

An unarmed Trident II D5 missile is test-launched from the US Navy ballistic missile submarine USS Nebraska off the coast of California, March 26, 2018. The Kings Bay facility broken into by the Plowshares 7 stores similar weapons.(US Navy / Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Ronald Gutridge / Reuters)

On the morning of Saturday, October 19, Clare Grady meditated on the local bird songs and prayed upon Luke 12: “When you are brought before synagogues, rulers, and authorities, do not worry about how you will defend yourselves or what you will say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you at that time what you should say.”

“The keyword is when,” said Grady. “It is not if—it is when.”

It’s a mark of many Catholic Worker activists that they expect to, at some point, be taken before “rulers and authorities.” As Grady and six others—a group of Catholic activists calling themselves the Kings Bay Plowshares 7—entered the Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base in St. Marys, Georgia, on April 4, 2018, the loudspeakers blared: “Use of deadly force is authorized.” But they were there exactly because they view the facility as an epicenter of lethal force.

The Plowshares 7 brought hammers, small bottles of blood, spray paint, and crime scene tape, which they strung across the facility. The base houses the Trident nuclear missile system; the group hoisted a sign that read “The Ultimate Logic of Trident: Omnicide,” poured the blood on the ground, and spray painted “Love One Another” on the pavement.

Current Issue

View our current issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

They were not shot. But as their trial begins today, October 21, in Brunswick, Georgia, the seven activists are facing decades in prison. Some have already racked up over a year in jail. Elizabeth McAlister—whose late partner was Philip Berrigan, of Baltimore’s resistance community Jonah House—was held at Glynn County Detention Center in Brunswick, Georgia, after refusing bail conditions for nearly 18 months. (She was—to her surprise—released earlier this month.)

Another of the 7, Father Steven Kelly, a Jesuit priest, remains in jail, and has excoriated recent court decisions for “having precluded truth-telling in the courtroom.” Other defendants include Patrick O’Neill of North Carolina, Carmen Trotta of the New York City Catholic Worker community, and Martha Hennessy, who splits her time between New York and her home in Vermont. (Trotta and Hennessy were interviewed on the podcast Intercepted earlier this year, a rare break from a remarkable media silence.)

“It’s not a ‘navy base,’ it’s a military facility that threatens all humanity,” said Luz Catarineau Colville. She and her husband, Mark Colville, another of the defendants, have run the Amisdad Catholic Worker in New Haven, Connecticut, for decades.

Colville, who was released from jail at the beginning of October, has called nuclear weapons the “taproot” of so much wrong with society. “By enslaving the human psyche to the idolatry of power, nuclearism underwrites all other forms of state-inflicted mayhem on the planet,” he wrote in June.

If that seems an exaggeration, consider many of the arguments put forth in Daniel Ellsberg’s 2017 book, The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear Weapons Planner. Ellsberg documents 25 times the United States has used nuclear weapons during various crises, including against the Soviet Union, China, Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, and North Korea. By “use,” Ellsberg—and many of the Plowshares activists—mean in the same way as when a thief brandishes a cocked gun to achieve their purpose.

Ellsberg has filed an affidavit with the court arguing that the defendants were justified in their actions because they are attempting to prevent “omnicide, the collateral murder of nearly every human on earth in a war in which the nuclear missiles aboard Trident submarines were launched.” (Ellsberg, best known for releasing the Pentagon Papers to the Senate and the press in 1971, also argues that direct actions are what helped propel him to expose those documents—meaning, direct actions get results.)

But decisions of the judge have largely shut the door to the jury hearing anything about such defenses of “justification” or “necessity.” On Friday, Judge Lisa Godbey Wood of the US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia prohibited a whole series of defenses—including the testimony of international lawyer Francis Boyle of the University of Illinois, on the illegality of US nuclear policy—writing that while the defendants’ “subjective beliefs about the illegality of nuclear weapons may be relevant background information, whether nuclear weapons are actually illegal under international or domestic law…is not relevant or an appropriate issue to litigate in this case.”

Support urgent independent journalism this Giving Tuesday

I know that many important organizations are asking you to donate today, but this year especially, The Nation needs your support. 

Over the course of 2025, the Trump administration has presided over a government designed to chill activism and dissent. 

The Nation experienced its efforts to destroy press freedom firsthand in September, when Vice President JD Vance attacked our magazine. Vance was following Donald Trump’s lead—waging war on the media through a series of lawsuits against publications and broadcasters, all intended to intimidate those speaking truth to power. 

The Nation will never yield to these menacing currents. We have survived for 160 years and we will continue challenging new forms of intimidation, just as we refused to bow to McCarthyism seven decades ago. But in this frightening media environment, we’re relying on you to help us fund journalism that effectively challenges Trump’s crude authoritarianism. 

For today only, a generous donor is matching all gifts to The Nation up to $25,000. If we hit our goal this Giving Tuesday, that’s $50,000 for journalism with a sense of urgency. 

With your support, we’ll continue to publish investigations that expose the administration’s corruption, analysis that sounds the alarm on AI’s unregulated capture of the military, and profiles of the inspiring stories of people who successfully take on the ICE terror machine. 

We’ll also introduce you to the new faces and ideas in this progressive moment, just like we did with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. We will always believe that a more just tomorrow is in our power today.  

Please, don’t miss this chance to double your impact. Donate to The Nation today.

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

And while Attorney General William Barr may excoriate “militant secularists” and Vice President Mike Pence may exalt “religious freedom” when it’s useful, Judge Wood is moving to prevent all mention of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in the courtroom, to the silence of many. This even though, as defendant O’Neill noted, “the court determined that [their] actions were both ‘prophetic’ and ‘sacramental.’”

(While many US bishops have supported the Plowshares 7, along with Archbishop Desmond Tutu and other notables, the Vatican has been notably silent.)

“This is a kangaroo court with a rubber stamp and a railroad all put together,” said Boyle before the trial.

But on Sunday evening, Martha Hennessy—granddaughter of Catholic Worker founder Dorothy Day—understatedly spoke to a crowd of about 200 supporters at a rally they called a Festival of Hope. “I believe in conversions in the court room,” she said. “It’s going to be a very exciting week.”

Sam HusseiniTwitterSam Husseini is a contributor to The Nation and senior analyst with the Institute for Public Accuracy.


Latest from the nation