A Moral Case for Climate Action

A Moral Case for Climate Action

Pope Francis understands that the choice to confront the climate crisis now lies with the people.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

On June 18, Pope Francis released his encyclical on the environment and climate change, calling for urgent climate action. In it, he makes the religious and moral argument for addressing the climate crisis, emphasizing the need for “technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels” to be “progressively replaced without delay.”

The encyclical aligns the Catholic Church with the grassroots climate movement, not with institutions that produce and ignore crisis. “Particular appreciation is owed to those who tirelessly seek to resolve the tragic effects of environmental degradation on the lives of the world’s poorest,” he writes. “Young people demand change.” This is the wisdom of a leader who understands that the choice to confront the climate crisis now lies with the people. Institutions will follow.

Pope Francis also demonstrates how influence should be used in a time of crisis. With privilege comes the responsibility to advocate for the people who power has silenced. This message is shared by the fossil fuel divestment movement, which calls on prominent individuals and institutions to convert their privilege into heroic moral leadership. Pope Francis understands: He has even recruited Nation columnist and author Naomi Klein to join his efforts. His call to action and recognition of grassroots organizing will give activists far greater leverage to push Catholic institutions to divest from fossil fuels.

The pope lives what I call the “radical now,” demonstrating how power and politics must be challenged in the name of what we love. He’s not waiting for the future, nor are we.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x