Fox News Defends Arizona Ethnic Studies Ban

Fox News Defends Arizona Ethnic Studies Ban

Fox News Defends Arizona Ethnic Studies Ban

Greta Van Susteren says "advocating ethnic solidarity" is wrong.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

It was a dirty job, but somebody had to do it: defend the new Arizona law that bans ethnic studies in public schools. Fox News anchor Greta van Susteren took on the task, with predictable results.

The law bans classes that "are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group," "promote resentment toward a race or class of people," or "advocate ethnic solidarity.”

Van Susteren took up the issue just after UN human rights experts released a statement criticizing the law on the grounds that all people have the right to learn about their own cultural and linguistic heritage.

What exactly is wrong with Arizona schools offering Chicano Studies classes?   Van Susteren asked Tom Horne, Arizona superintendent of public instruction, who sponsored the bill and who is running for state attorney general (you may be able to guess his political party). 

The problem, Horne said, is that when schools offer Ethnic Studies courses to students, “they’re dividing them up just like the old South.” 

Well, not really: the problem with the old South was not that black students took black studies classes for an hour a day; the problem was that black students were prohibited by law from attending white schools. The problem was that all black students were sent to separate black schools which were inferior to the white schools. 

Second problem, according to Greta van Susteren’s expert: “They’re teaching them to emphasize ethnic solidarity,” Horne said. “That’s exactly is the wrong thing to do.” So instead of learning about Latino solidarity, this law teaches the Mexican-American kids a different lesson: in the words of Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson, the message is “We have power. You don’t.”

Van Susteren didn’t take up several other problems raised by critics of the law. If you ban classes that “promote resentment towards a race or class of people,” doesn’t that eliminate teaching about 9-11, because that would tend to promote resentment towards Muslims?

Somehow Fox News isn’t worried about teaching resentment towards Muslims.

Van Susteren brought up another issue: a Tucson high school once had a speaker named—according to her Fox News website—“Delores Juerta.” (I believe they are referring to Dolores Huerta, co-founder of the United Farmworkers of America.) “Juerta” told students that “Republicans hate Latinos.” This is what’s wrong with teaching ethnic studies, Van Susteren suggested.

“Juerta” spoke in 2006. Angry Republicans have been quoting this line ever since—if you Google “Republicans hate Latinos,” you get 40,000 results.

One problem: “Delores Juerta” didn’t say that in an ethnic studies class. She said it in a high school assembly—to everybody, whites included. Apparently what is needed is not just a ban on ethnic studies courses, but also a ban on speakers who offend Republicans. (Horne, to his credit, is against that: “kids learn from controversial speakers, but they need to hear both sides,” he said.)

The law also prohibits classes that "promote the overthrow of the U.S. government"—which of course has been such a big problem in the Arizona public schools. Van Susteren didn’t go there.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x